Wednesday, May 3, 2006

Political Shootout Sunday: Alderman Moore vs. Posner.

joe moore
Political Shootout this coming Sunday will feature Alderman Joe Moore [49th], main author of the foie gras ban in Chicago restaurants (although the alderman is a firm supporter of abortion even in late term), a Democratic National Committeeman and Kathy Posner, former head of her own public relations agency, Republican chairman of the executive committee of the City Club and pro-lifer. That’s Sunday on WLS-AM (890) at 8 p.m.

Answer to Devastating Riposte #2:

Reader WPD has it right. When Alexander Woolcott greeted Dorothy Parker with the curt, “My dear Miss Parker, you look almost like a man!” her answer was: “So do you!” It knocked him for a loop because his masculinity was somewhat in doubt! He hugged her and on the spot invited me to be a Algonquin Roundtable member. Congratulations, WPD!

Now another. No one will get this because it’s fairly obscure. And it’s mildly scatological, for which pardon. Dr. Russell Kirk, the famous father of modern conservative thought, was a visiting fellow at Princeton for a year. Dr. Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., the Harvard-trained ultra-liberal prize-winning biographer of Andrew Jackson, FDR and JFK happened to be doing a lecture there at the same time. During a break, both ended up in the Men’s Room, standing side by side where they disputed conservatism vs. liberalism rather vigorously. When Schlesinger finished, he went to the sink and scrubbed his hands vigorously. Kirk completed his work and sailed out the door. Schlesinger caught up with him and said, loud enough for many to hear:

“At Harvard we were taught to wash our hands after we pee!”

Kirk stopped and in a voice equally loud responded:

What?

Guest Editorial: Illinois Real Estate Taxes by Al Harris (Contributor)

taxes-795969
[Contributor Al Harris, a vigorous respondent to this blog, starts the ball rolling with a superb commentary on out-of-control real estate taxes. Looks to me like he is interested in generating a real taxpayers’ revolution. If so, let it begin here! If you agree or disagree with Al, write your short assent or dissent on Reader’s Comments. If you want to do a commentary of your own on this blog, suggest a topic on Reader’s Comments. You’ll probably get an o.k. Then, so we don’t duplicate, write 200 words and send it to me email: : thomasfroeser@sbcglobal.net Thanks! I’d like to have at least one each day. Al has at least three or four more to get off his chest. Thanks a lot and outstanding job, Al!]

By Al Harris

Tom, thanks for the mention. I do get worked up on political issues because I see this one great state sliding to the left under the political Democratic trifecta of a Democratic mayor of Chicago, a Democratic governor, a Democratic House and Senate and a Democratic state Supreme Court. I firmly believe that Gov. Ryan greased the skids for this takeover.

Anyway, my first issue is Illinois Real Estate taxes. Real estate taxes in Chicago are out of control. Just talk to any small business property owner in Cook county or a home owner in Lake, Cook, McHenry counties, etc.

The low interest rates put in by the Fed led to an explosion of value which was eagerly taken up by assessors into valuation increases. Especially hard hurt were those in tear-down areas from Hinsdale to Highland Park. Tear-down values were extrapolated by the assessors to neighbors’ homes and produced high tax increases for everyone. For example, a friend in Bannockburn saw his house taxes go up from $15,000 in 1999 to $31,000 today. But you say there are tax caps. The tax caps affect the rate only not the assessment. Seniors could only protect themselves by becoming indebted to the state by allowing the taxes plus interest to accumulate on the property until sold which is only a confiscation of value.

Did the school districts in the suburbs restrain their take because of the valuation windfall? No, they grabbed the taxes and dramatically raised teacher and administrative salaries. Cal Skinner showed this on his website district-by-district. Drivers ed teachers making over $100,000. School district administrators like the recently-retired in the Palatine elementary district getting over $300,000 per year. And still the education union wanted more and more and more! On the news you only heard about the “poor areas” and not about the tax grabs in the suburbs! The places hardest hit were the Republican strongholds across the Chicago area.

There needs to be a real estate tax revolution in Illinois. A prop 87 style revolution. And the union will whine and cry about the “kids.”

On the other side, if you are a big connected commercial developer, donating bucks to the Metropolitan Planning Council, you get a TIF in many areas. A TIF is “Tax Incremental Financing” which was originally intended for blighted areas. It is now being used for places like Oak Brook or St. Charles. Simply put, a TIF is like using your taxes to pay down the construction mortgage cost of your home…or your big development. Walmart in Sandwich got such a TIF and sales tax rebate from Sandwich. Home Depot demanded a TIF from St. Charles. Hiffman developers demanded and got a TIF from Oak Brook for a retail mall. What does the home-owner get or small business owner get as the tax burden grows: nothing! The small business owner without tax breaks or TIFs is asked to compete on an uneven tax playing field with the boys like Walmart or Home Depot. http://www.metroplanning.org

The answer is not the uneven tax swaps that are skewed toward the IEA (Illinois Education Association). The answer is a slash in government spending and a slash in school waste and outrageous salaries for the education elite. There must be a change in handling assessments that does not chase people out of their homes.

Something must be done or most people will be taxed out of their home. For many people the real estate tax is their biggest and most hated tax. It is time this issue was addressed!

Agree with Al? Disagree? Comment briefly on Reader’s Comments. Then we hope you think about writing a 200-word commentary like Al’s. Tell me what you’re thinking of doing on Reader’s Comments. Then when you get the o.k., send it to me at thomasfroeser@sbcglobal.net

Tuesday, May 2, 2006

Presidential Fund-Raiser for Topinka Suspended and Wait `Til You Hear Why.

The much looked-forward-to fund-raising dinner headed by President Bush for Judy Baar Topinka has been suspended until further notice, my Washington sources with close touch to the White House tell me.

The reason will astound you. Remember the story that an aide to Topinka told George Will that (a) the president is needed here only to raise money and because he’s so unpopular for nothing else; and (b) he should hold the fund-raiser in a secure, undisclosed location? That body-blow to the president publicized by a national correspondent has been used as a powerful weapon against Bush by liberals seeking to prove that as wartime leader he is a liability. And this despite the active support of Topinka by Bob Kjellander via his ties with Karl Rove.

Now it develops that the source of those comments was not an aide, not Nancy Kimme but Topinka herself! Her campaign sought to protect her by saying that an aide was responsible for the devastating insult to the president from an establishment-anointed Republican nominee for governor. Some unnamed aide was given the blame, but it’s not true: no matter how many denials they make. Result: the dinner which Topinka hoped would raise big bucks has been shelved for now, despite Blagojevich’s stepping up his paid media attacks. Yet, understandably, the White House feels that for a statewide Republican candidate to say this to a national correspondent is almost unforgivable. Don’t be too easily convinced by a quick Topinka tut-tut denial. After all, she continues to steadfastly deny refusing to endorse U. S. Senator Peter Fitzgerald for reelection even though more than 75,000 listeners heard her wiggle out of providing support

The Brunner-Goldner Contest On My WLS Show Was Historic Because

...never before has a Daley campaign leader faced charges linking the mayor to precedent made by the George Ryan conviction. Always the media have been satisfied with a stony denial and rant by the mayor with his political people either playing mum or dumb. Greg Goldner was the campaign manager for the mayor in his last run in 2003 and has been requested to answer some questions before the feds. Frankly, I give him a great deal of credit for having the guts to be on the show. Terry Brunner, former executive director of the Better Government Association, has been a federal prosecutor, a key member of an organized crime strike force under Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and a prosecuting attorney in Wisconsin.

The program was significant for four reasons. First, Brunner has become the first prominent ex-prosecutor to publicly affirm that the Mayor may well be in trouble as result of the Ryan precedent. Second, he was the first prominent ex-prosecutor to publicly affirm that Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign committee may be in trouble for using city workers in his first campaign—a campaign that Greg Goldner ran—against Nancy Kazak…a charge that should have national repercussions since Emanuel is criss-crossing the nation inveighing against a Republican “culture of corruption.” Third, while I don’t know how he votes (and don’t want to), having known him for 30 years, I can attest that Brunner is no Republican but has a long lineage of background that would warrant his being associated with liberal Democratic public officials.

Fourth, Goldner was the first responsible representative of the Daley campaign to respond to the charges. He is no “dat-dese-dem” guy who follows the classic pattern of hear-no-evil, see-no-evil. He candidly argues Daley is innocent. The program was moderated as even-handedly as I could make it. The exchange, while not bitter, was heavy and content-filled.

The deafening silence and black-out which greeted the program by the so-called “mainstream media” shows clearly that non-approved anti-Establishment news is not appreciated. For one thing, Brunner is the exec for the Airport Integrity Project which has been fighting Daley’s O’Hare expansion. An enormous preponderance of media, business and labor interests support the expansion. The black-out is signal reason why another Chicago news outlet is needed to offset the mono-media Combine. In the eyes of the MSM media, this broadcast was a non-event. It didn’t happen.

To get the other side, keep listening to “Political Shootout” airing every Sunday night between 8 p.m. and 9 on WLS-AM (890) and tune in to this Blog.

Political Potpourri: The Tag “Zombie” is Right on the Money for Topinka…Marin Loves it When Men Talk Dirty but Not When She Can’t Write It

A Sun-Times columnist recently called Judy Baar Topinka a “zombie” and meant it as a compliment. His point is that she has outlasted many attempts to drive a stake through her heart (notably the last primary). Gee, she’s ahead of Blagojevich by a smashing two points when last I checked and got fewer votes than were cast for others. But since a zombie usually is pictured as a creature from another era, I’d say the portrait is accurate in that when she’s electrified she gives the distinct picture of the Thompson-Edgar-Ryan throwback …

Still, study where the favorable media mentions are coming for Topinka are coming from. Usually from those organs that rarely, if ever, disagree with House Speaker Mike Madigan. Madigan, whose mum cat-ate-the-canary smile reflects “ah, if you only knew what I know” is actually following a complicated game plan that almost defies political gravity. For one thing, he wants to preserve his House majority which would warrant his supporting Gov. Blagojevich. But for another, he knows that if Judy Baar Topinka wins the governorship, she will impose a general tax hike which will detonate the Republicans in the same manner Dick Ogilvie’s inauguration of the state income tax did in 1969. That tax hike could easily lead to the ascension of his daughter Lisa as governor in four years and the heralding of a Democratic dynasty. This necessitates that Madigan play on both sides of the net, difficult for some but nevertheless do-able for this inscrutable Buddha. But he must have big-time media help.

Such help must make it appear that Madigan supports Blagojevich but actually accomplish a feat that gets Topinka elected while Madigan keeps or adds to his majority. This causes the oh-so-gentle coverage of Topinka by media oracles close to Madigan and faintly flavored reports about Topinka’s campaign which is non-existent coupled with the savaging of Blagojevich…

Those of you who were waiting breathlessly for the next intellectual

rumble of analysis from the Sun-Times’ Carol Marin and happened to miss it Sunday, here it is. She discovered two aldermen talking dirty, couldn’t publish their words, regrets that a male columnist can and she can’t…Meanwhile Lynn Sweet adds to her laurels in the city’s Democratic newspaper of record by becoming a celebrity watcher, ooh’ing and ah-ing over lefty George Clooney…

Earlier the Sun-Times publisher’s wife who writes under the nom de plume of Jennifer Hunter (and writes lefty editorials that are unsigned but have to be accepted) issued an ultimatum to Saudi Arabia to stop discriminating against women. That takes guts…Some conservatives planning another big annual day-long bash are trying to get the Oberweis and Brady forces together. You mean there are still some conservatives for Brady after his savaging of Oberweis rather than Topinka which gave the nod to Topinka? Lots of luck…

Inside the Trib’s editorial board, the word is that one of the reasons Topinka wasn’t endorsed by the paper was because she wouldn’t disavow Bob Kjellander. But that’s only one reason: the main one was lack of substance…Illinois has had governors who could beautifully write and speak the king’s English. John Henry Altgeld brilliantly defended his freeing of some Haymarket immigrants. Language lifted Frank O. Lowden to become a major challenger for the Republican presidential nomination in 1920. Graceful language, delivered in writing and orally, propelled Adlai Stevenson to national attention. Now we have a Democratic governor who responds to criticism by saying, “that’s a bunch of baloney!” We have a Republican challenger who relies on the cliché “this hen will deliver!” Line up all the challengers on both sides of the aisle on the issue of English usage and you’ll do better than this duo

Winners of the Devastating Riposte Contest

They are Jim Leahy, exec of the Republican Assembly of Illinois and Bill Pascoe, conservative political consultant. Rehashing the scene: In the House of Commons one day, Gladstone shouted to Disraeli, “Sir, you will die either by hanging or from a loathsome social disease.”

To which Disraeli replied: “That depends on whether I embrace your principles or your mistress.”

Now the next devastating reply quiz. Dorothy Parker, the brilliant New Yorker writer, was hired by the magazine when she was only 23. A mannish person, she was not exactly the most stunning of lookers, but even at that tender age she was honing a rapier-sharp wit. Robert Benchley, her superior at the magazine, didn’t know that when he first met her. He decided to take her as his guest to a luncheon meeting at the Algonquin Hotel. The Algonquin Round Table was composed of a group of bright intellects: Oscar Levant; Franklin P. Adams, who was the ranking humor columnist of the Herald-Tribune; Benchley and Walter Kiernan of the Times—but it was presided over by Alexander Woolcott, legendary wit, playright, critic and all-round genius (about whom the play “The Man Who Came to Dinner” was written). Needless to say the group, which met in the 1920s was composed of male chauvinists when Parker became the first woman to attend.

Before Benchley took Parker to the Algonquin, he prepped her: “Dorothy, Alexander Woolcott makes a habit of insulting every new guest. He insulted me, Kiernan, Adams and Levant. He is so brilliant an insulter that no one can effectively respond to his insult. My advice to you is this: when he meets you and insults you, just take it. If you try to top him, he will then counter with such brilliance that you’ll fall flat on your face.”

She nodded. When they approached the Roundtable, the Great Man arose, extended his hand and said, “My dear Miss Parker, you look almost like a man!”

Her devastating reply so sorely wounded him that she was immediately accepted as a full member. What was her reply?

Monday, May 1, 2006

Al Harris: This is For You!

Okay, you’ve been an eloquent critic of this blog; you write well; you charge with great candor that I’m a wimp for asking questions about poetry because I’m too timid to bring up the issues that you list in Comments and call Political Shootout a “garden party” for palsy-walsies. Not so and so I want you to write a tract (200 words max) on one of those issues—just one at this time—and we’ll post it here. Then we’ll take two, three, four etc. I don’t think I deserve that crack, Al Harris, but you’re asked—even ordered—to write the first one here. And as you write it, tell why I am so hesitant to discuss it.

In the meantime for those who you who think I’m not a wimp for talking about literature, let me give you the answer to the last question. Bob in P.F. looked it up; no one answered correctly so—the quotes are from essays by philosopher and literary master Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626) who had a rapid career up in politics and a lightening fast trip down.

Born to a prominent family, educated at Oxford, trained in diplomacy in France; studied law, elected to parliament; became one of Elizabeth’s learned counsels; promoted to ordinary council to James I; then solicitor-general, attorney-general; privy councilor; lord keeper of the seal; finally lord chancellor. Then accused of taking bribes, confessed guilt; deprived of office; fined; imprisoned then released; barred from sitting in parliament; barred from practicing law. “I confess,” he wrote, “[that] I have taken all knowledge to be my province.” Working hatless and coatless outside in early April to experiment with the preservative qualities of snow killed him. He was always more concerned with the reasoning process to attain truth than the detailed results.

Now for the Rest of You Who Want to Play

The subject switches to devastating replies. Here’s an easy one. In an address in the House of Commons, Gladstone said to Disraeli (I paraphrase), “Sir, you will likely die either of hanging or from a loathsome social disease.”

Disraeli’s devastating reply?

Flashback: To an Adjoining Town to Investigate a Murder Where an Intruder Crashes a Party

[Another chapter for my kids and grandchildren to read some day after I’m long gone].

For the first time in a year and a half I enjoyed life in a small city without worrying that I would get stuck there in-perpetuity. So, lighthearted and free, I drove my 47 Chevrolet, the headlights sagging with fatigue and 100,000 miles, to neighboring Sauk Rapids (population: 250). Object: to get a Pulitzer prize for solving case of a missing bar-made which I assumed to have been murder (absolute fantasy for a 27 year old). Logistics: interview as many people as I could find who were regular patrons of the “V Bar” there, located in a neon-lighted semi-rural slum, a tacky bar that stayed open well after legal closing, patronized by denizens of nearby trailer camps.

Started off with the Benton county sheriff’s office (adjoining county to my own favorite, Stearns): no luck. They were distinctly opposed to any nosy newsmen. They had launched a cursory search but gave up. Reason: owner of the “V Bar” was paying them off to wink at closing law violation. Best lead I had came from talking to her parents. She was in love with the dissolute owner-bartender. He was two-timing her. They had remonstrated with her to leave him but she liked bad boys. One winter night when they had a public row at the bar over his roaming eye, she took off the ring he had bought her, slammed it down on the bar, got in her overcoat and stalked out. He followed her shortly after. He returned in a few hours alone, and ran the bar until closing at about 3 a.m. (two hours later than the legal closing limit). She was never seen again; he never mentioned it. Those who asked where she was were treated with icy disdain.

At noon I treated myself to a hamburger (this, before the era of McDonald’s) at a local greasy spoon. As I sat at the counter browsing through a copy of the Benton County Recorder, there was a deafening crash. All of us in the greasy spoon ran to the window. There was diagonal parking. Someone swung into the diagonal parking lot next to us and didn’t apply the brakes in time, pushing up over the curb, through a plate glass window and crashing into the hardware store adjoining us. We ran through next door, stepped through the chasm created by the crash (the rear end of the car was visible jutting out onto the sidewalk). A Sauk Rapids constable was assisting the driver out of the ruined vehicle. He was obviously drunk; an overweight farmer with a two-day stubble of beard, a jagged line of yellow tobacco juice traced down his double chins; eyes glassy.

A large group had gathered around. Nobody was hurt; attendants with brooms were sweeping away the broken glass and debris. The cop grabbed the driver by the collar, pulling him out of his car and told the group: “This guy did something just like this a month ago, believe it or not!” Everyone grumbled in disdain. The disreputable culprit stood forlorn. The cop said, “What’s your name? “ He asked several times. Then the driver said, “Gasser. James Gasser.” “You’re the guy who did this just a month ago at a Piggly Wiggly store, aren’t you?” The driver looked penitent. The cop said, “We booked you for drunk driving then and suspended your license. What are you driving on now?” The penitent handed over his wallet. No license. “Mr. Gasser,” said the cop, “this time we’re takin’ you in. Our municipal judge will decide but likely you can only get out by paying a $500 bail. Let’s go!” As the ruffian was led away, somebody in the group commented, “His name’s Gasser. Good name for him. He’s gassed to the limit.”

Nothing all that significant. I wandered around getting a few interviews, then headed back to St. Cloud thinking no more of the incident. When I got to the office, I decided to write up the accident for tomorrow’s paper which I did in curt style. But my editor didn’t like the brevity. He called me over. “Myron [our photographer]’s got a picture of the car sticking out of the hardware store. Tomorrow’s going to be slow. Why don’t you re-write this thing and give it more pep! What’s the matter with you? When you came here you were giving all these local stories more flavor! You’re spoiled writing about Hubert Humphrey? Write this one up cute; make a play on his name Gasser, and we’ll put your byline on it. It’s going on the front page.” Front page? A cheesy little car accident where nobody’s killed or hurt? “That’s all we got,” he said. “Anyhow, this guy’s done it before, swung into a diagonal parking lot gassed and plowed right into a grocery store! Repeat offender! See what you can do to juice this one up!”

Yessir. When you’re earning $67.50 a week and your editor wants a story juiced, you obey. So I called the constable in Sauk Rapids, got him to say a lot of entertaining things and wrote it up. When I finished, I thought it was way over the top but I handed it in. “Good,” said the editor.

When the paper came out the next afternoon, the story and photo swept the front page with a headline like: Gassed-Up Car Intrudes on Peace of Sauk Rapids; Driver Gasser was `Glassy-Eyed’ in 2nd Over-the-Curb Store Invasion Says Constable. My byline was used. It struck me that we were exploiting the guy’s name, but it was the second-time and somebody could have been killed. I didn’t think about it again. Anyhow, I had more on my mind than Mr. Gasser. I had joined an organization called Toastmasters, International. It was a once-a-week dinner club which trained shy people how to make speeches. I had always been leery of public speaking when I was in school and decided to kick the fright. They had a free trial period for three weeks and I signed up. Everybody in the club had to stand up and make speeches, mostly short; after which they were criticized by the group. I found it helped me kick the nervousness. It was my night to make a debut with a six-minute speech which I had worked on for several days. So I forgot about Mr. Gasser and headed for Granite Bowl Recreation, a bowling alley with a banquet hall in the back where Toastmasters met.

I had no sooner arrived and treated myself to a Coke (no alcoholic beverages were permitted for main speakers) when a waiter came to me and said I was wanted on the phone. I went to the bar and took the call. It was a woman’s voice. She spoke in a calm voice but it was clear she was holding her emotions in check. “Mr. Roeser, I am Mrs. Gasser. I just want to tell you this entire family is distraught because of your story.” I said: well, I’m sorry, Mrs. Gasser, but I was right nearby when your husband plowed through the hardware store window.” She ignored it and continued: “That you and your paper are ridiculing our name…” I agreed with her that what we did was outrageous but I couldn’t give her any satisfaction. Then she shouted in an hysterical voice: “You ridiculed our name! Our children have suffered today in school! Do you know what you did, Mr. Roeser? You RIDICULED OUR NAME!”

Well, said I, I--. “You have humiliated us! There is no place for us to turn! My husband is outraged!” And she hung up. I went back to my table where the meal had already begun and my fellow members were making small statements while the remainder of the membership was taking notes for positive criticism. I started on my salad when the waiter again came to my table. I had a phone call. I got up and went to the bar. “Mr. Roeser!” she shouted in a voice that rattled the phone wires, “I want to tell you the pain of this thing is unbearable!” I waited for her to quit but it was clear she wasn’t about to. “Just a minute, madam!” I said. “Listen to me! Your husband plowed his car through a store window for the second straight time in a month! If I were you I’d…” but she continued half-sobbing, screaming. I hung up. Now greatly disturbed, I returned to try to grab the remainder of my meal.

I had just tasted the first morsel of my steak when the waiter came to me for the third time. Everybody wondered what was happening. I got up, went to the phone. This time she was calm. “Mr. Roeser, I just want to tell you this. My husband has got a gun and he’s heading over to the Granite City Bowl to kill you!” I was speechless but thought: So this is how it’s going to end for Tommy Roeser! This guy Gasser is going to barge into the restaurant and plug me! Should I get out of here now and leave my steak and forget the speech? Should I tell them I’m under threat of death and forget my speech? If I don’t and am killed, I can imagine what my mother will say. She will say “What? You say my son was shot to death in a bowling alley? Huh? You tell me that my son was trying to make a speech at something called Toastmasters at a place called the Granite Bowl in St. Cloud and an enraged drunk named Gasser who had driven his car through two store windows ran into the hall and shot him seven times? You say this happened in St. Cloud, Minnesota where the last time he was in danger of death his jaws were held shut by a frantic Finlander in Duluth where he was nearly strangled with suds from two dissolved Alka Seltzer tablets for a Knights of Columbus initiation? And now this?”

As I stood listening to her, the president of Toastmasters was at my elbow and said, “You’re on in two minutes!” I said, “Mrs. Gasser, listen to me. I take that threat very seriously. I am going to call the Sheriff of Stearns county who is a personal friend. He is coming to send a deputy here immediately and if there is to be a shoot-out, hear me…”

She tried to interrupt. I said, “No, you’ve been calling me all night! Now I want you to hear me! If there’s going to be an attempt on my life, by God your husband will pay the price—either by being pumped full of lead here or under a death sentence. Now I’m calling the sheriff of Stearns county!”

I was about to hang up and comfort the aghast Toastmaster President when she said, “No, no. Hang on!” A man’s voice came on the wire.

“Roeser, this is Marty Nilan your old Knights of Columbus friend. My daughter, Colleen, really had you going, didn’t she? We read the story in the paper and decided to play this gag. She’s study drama at St. Cloud State Teachers College. She’s terrific, isn’t she?”

Small town practical joke.

I hung up and followed the president back to the gathering which was awaiting my maiden presentation. The group looked at my ghastly white face, settled back and sat through the introduction, convinced that I was the worst victim of stage fright they would ever hear. Instead of making the formal presentation I had prepared for, I told them what happened. The uproarious reception told me that I had passed the first test and was accepted as a fellow Toastmaster.

But all the way home I said over and over, “That damned Marty Nilan!”

The next day at Sauk Rapids my investigation seemed to come to nothing. I was just about to scrub it when I was told the enraged owner of the V Bar, a big political shot in a tiny town, wanted to see me. I was as calm as I could be. Nothing could be as horrific as the series of phone calls from the screaming wife of James Gasser who was on the way to kill me.

___________________________________________

Next time: How things turned out with the missing bar-maid.