Showing posts with label General. Show all posts
Showing posts with label General. Show all posts

Monday, November 13, 2006

The Barack Obama Phenomenon: If the Democrats Were Smart, They’d Nominate Him. If Voters Were Smart, They’d Defeat Him.

baracktalking
barackthoughtful
Anyhow, Get it Over with: He’s a Fad Like the Hula Hoop; Nominate Him, Get the Fever Out of the Blood and Count on Him Scaring the U.S. with His Naivete. Limpid Eyes and Soft Words? Not in a President!

A reprint of my column with some updating in The Wanderer, the nation’s oldest national Catholic newspaper.


By Thomas F. Roeser

CHICAGO—Actor, composer and mordant wit Oscar Levant once said that he knew Doris Day before she was a virgin. Not that this daughter of German Catholic immigrants was a spiritual phenomenon. It was that Levant couldn’t get over her real bio from the hype. Here was a girl who started as a Hollywood kid dancer at age 12 with little observable parental guidance, then bit parts to adolescence when she became a big band singer with Les Brown and Bob Hope at 18—through having had three husbands by age 30 to becoming the naïve, almost nun-like object of Rock Hudson’s affection in “Pillow Talk”… which earned her PhotoPlay’s designation as the most believable actress in America in her mid-30s! Get this: most believable! Then, at age 40 still everybody’s grown-up, freckled-faced kid sister singing, with misty, milky eyes the philosophical Que Sera, Sera [What will be, will be]. Drumming at his piano with a martini standing by, Levant would say: “I can’t believe it.”

I know how Levant felt about Doris Day but in a political venue. It takes some telling. I still visit for a client Illinois’ capitol which still smacks some of the hayseed town Lincoln knew. Some cab drivers still chew tobacco and roll down the window to spit. They speak southern. A car is called a “core.” A park a “pork.” They still talk about a legendary Democratic House Speaker and secretary of state named Paul Powell (they pronounce it “Pol Pal” in southern Illinois-ese) who was found dead in a hotel room with $600,000 stuffed in shoe-boxes in the closet and a legacy of 10,000 spectacular stories of deals.

Well, in our state capitol until recently could be found a lanky 6-foot-6-inch black man who was just another Chicago Democratic liberal, no better, no worse. Once in a while I would see him trade stories with the bored white, southern state troopers who have to run every visitor through a metal detector. He was a state senator with a name so odd that everybody figured he was at a dead end. In a state where voters with few exceptions had gravitated to familiar Anglo names—Daley, Ryan, Madigan, Stratton—his was Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., not exactly your catchy political tag. To the troopers and everybody else around the Capitol, he was always a reasonable guy who never ruffled anybody’s fur. No governors or legislative leaders wondered how Obama felt about anything. The Chicago mayor certainly didn’t. Nor did the media for a long time. They figured with that awful name, he was lucky to be in the legislature at all.

He was born forty-five years ago in Honolulu, Hawaii to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. of Nyangoma-Kogelo, Kenya and Ann Dunham of Wichita, Kansas. His father got a scholarship to Harvard and skipped out, then went back to Kenya. He and Obama’s mother divorced and she then married an Indonesian foreign student, moving to Jakarta with Obama when he was six. Let’s say she liked exciting marriages and lands with strange sounding names.

It is no surprise that Barack Obama always wondered about father who abandoned him. But, and Obama never explains it, the missing black Dad has taken precedence in his dreams not so much for his white mother who stuck by him. He wrote a book, Dreams from My Father which describes what he calls a nearly race-oblivious childhood with a father “black as pitch, my mother white as milk.” In all this genealogical yearning, young Obama hasn’t made much of his mother—but he obviously owes her everything: probably his looks which gives him a unique light tan coloring, flap ears women call cute and deep, unfathomable, limpid and soulful eyes like Bambi. In fact as he grew up, he became a black man with delicate, inoffensive courtly mien and a shy smile that your stereotypical well-off white liberal family from exurbia, desperately trying to be progressive, might not object to if he proposed to their blonde civil rights activist daughter from Smith. That’s pretty much the scenario of “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner?” isn’t it?

Obama has much more to him that a quiet deference to others. He lived with his white grandparents in Hawaii, went with them shelling out the tuition to Punahou, a highly-rated prep school like Phillips Exeter. They also paid for him to go to Occidental College in California, then to Columbia university in New York (I haven’t heard that he is preparing a book Dreams of My Mother and Her Parents but that’s another story). There he majored in political science, specializing in international relations. After graduating, he worked a year at IBM and was a typically well-dressed, pressed business type—but he tired of its machine-made atmosphere. Cautiously, carefully, a trademark he has always respected, he decided to take a job with a thoroughly respectable community organization based not far from where a few years ago I used to tutor blacks and Mexicans: Erie House. His job: helping local churches organize job-training programs. Then, after a short time to resume-build, he landed a slot at Harvard Law School.

Once at Harvard, he moved with typical caution but, in a school where affirmative action ranks high, he spread his wings and got elected president of the Harvard Law Review: the first non-white to do so. He took a summer job as intern at Sidley & Austin, the blue-chip firm whose mentor, Newton Minow, still burns a vigil light in memory of the late Adlai Stevenson, an Illinois governor noted for two things—an episode where state inspectors turned crooked and sold grade B horsemeat as prime filet and where state employees ran a counterfeiting ring to make bogus cigarette stamps, pocking the money and cheating the state of millions of dollars of revenue. But Stevenson was a soulful literary personage, writer and two-time presidential nominee. Minow, a multi-millionaire who never realized a Stevensonsonian Camelot, took Obama under his wing and in fact introduced him to another intern, a beautiful law student named Michelle Robinson who looks like your typical black fashion model in Vogue.

Being a languid man of light tan color (let’s say if he looked or acted threatening to whitey like the late Paul Robeson he’d be on his own) adopted by prestigious white liberals wasn’t all there was to him: Obama had the brain-power to graduate magna cum laude in 1991 from Harvard. Then back to Chicago where he worked as a staffer in a voter registration project but doubling as a junior lawyer in a firm up to its neck in liberal Democratic politics: Miner, Barnhill & Galland, run by venerable lefty activist and sentimentalist Judd Miner who used to battle with the original Mayor Daley over civil rights issues. His connections from Harvard Law got him a hitch as a professor of “constitutional law” at the University of Chicago. He married the beautiful Michelle who by then also had good contacts at the U of C—so good she hitched on as a community relations officer at U of C hospitals. They moved to the fashionable if extravagantly liberal Hyde Park neighborhood where the University is based. His gilt-edged resume proceeded him in the neighborhood. He wrote the book which stated frankly he not only smoked pot and inhaled but did cocaine—which made him one with deep-thought intellectuals and endeared him to the white New York east side Maoist trade.

Then came a small glitch There was an opening in 1996 for somebody with local residency to run for the state Senate but the constituency had a lot of black and poor. Barack Obama was not very black oriented in politics in a neighborhood where deep black is often preferred. And he was not poor: aristocratic, well-educated and rather dreamy, using such words as “epiphany” and not given to talking much about smelling the meat a-cookin’ the Democratic machine prefers. For a time he had trouble relating as Barack Obama with constituents whose names were something like Charlie Chew and Emil Jones (chain-smoking, hefty, easily-perspiring Emil Jones, a state senator in an adjoining district, then the Democratic minority leader of the Illinois State Senate). In his new neighborhood, Democratic liberalism comes undiluted, straight from the bottle; Obama liked to stir political concoctions with vague nuance: that was the way he talks to adoring whites now. But he had to learn how to talk not Harvard or southern black gentility but South Side. He was a master at blurring distinctions. But let me tell you that blurring distinctions is not what the Democratic machine does on Chicago’s South Side.

Here his old boss, the old liberal Jewish Judd Miner, tough as an old boot, applied venerable Jake Arvey old-school moxie from and cracked some heads. The order came from downtown that Obama was to go to the state Senate. And when there was some complaining, Senator Jones, the epitome of black working class that its adherents call “pick and shovel” said to his workers who kicked that Obama wasn’t one of them: “Y’all shut up! This guy is ours! And you will take him, hear me?” Jones was leader of the Senate Democrats and one of four top state officials who negotiate the budget with the governor (Catholic who, of course, is pro-abort) on the South Side. Now he is Senate President, the second African-American in Illinois history to hold the post.

Under Jones’ tutelage, Obama learned in his local speeches to speak South Side and added it to his repertoire along with southern gentility and university talk. He proved to be a good student; he talked in blunt declaratives; once in Springfield he could do all three. He could and can switch to all three voices. I have a local ABC talk show on politics and he wanted on. So one day I passed through the metal detector to find him lounging around and talking to the state troopers in terms they understand. He signaled me, came over and said with a winning smile: “Say, Big Guy, when do I get on your show?” And, of course, just like that he was on.

I remember when he first came on, he was uniquely different from the usual run-of-the-mill Chicago Democratic politician. He decided to try his sweet southern style mixed with university nuance. The station carries Rush Limbaugh and has a big audience that is well to the right. The first time he was on my show, Obama tried out sweet southern. A guy would call up and assail the liberals for trying “to take away my guns.” Obama would listen to him and seemingly make an effort to reconcile, saying he sympathized but on the other hand--. In a sense he would parse—balancing his response so that there was equal weight on either side with a slight, very slight, indication as to where he was heading. On my show and on others, he began the reputation that clings to him now of a “moderate”—where, in fact, there’s nothing moderate about him. The guy who wanted to keep his guns soon found that out but to a wider audience, Obama was parsing and sounding pretty good. As is the case with all parsers, the definitive differences are blurred. And on that show Barack Obama was an ace Sweet Southern. But what few understood was that he could do blurry or specific lefty talk—depending on who wanted to hear what.

In Springfield, he was making headway but certainly not overnight. He had a big fan in Senate President Jones and a few media types but he still was regarded by many blacks as too intellectual to understand their needs. So he concentrated on the meat-and-potatoes that African Americans can appreciate. He touted them with simple declarative sentences. In the Democratic state Senate he was chairman of the Health and Human Services committee. He helped author an Earned Income Tax Credit to help the working poor, worked for legislation to cover residents who couldn’t afford health insurance, helped pass laws on AIDS prevention and care programs.

Then, getting a modest share of media but nothing overwhelming—he decided to run for Congress. Moreover, he would take on one Congressman who makes every other African American pale—sociologically and politically: Bobby Rush. The idea of a equivocating, parsing black taking on Rush was titillating. Rush hasn’t done much in Congress but he can run his mouth with short words, the more the better. In fact, Bobby Rush has gone through several lifetimes of changes. He was a Boy Scout, the son of a Republican woman precinct worker (believe it or not) in the ghetto, an army draftee, a recruit for the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee in the South—and an AWOL soldier. Out of the brig and the army, he helped found the Illinois Black Panthers with its “Power to the People” slogan. He teamed up with one Fred Hampton, the Black Panthers chairman. The Panthers were regarded as such a threat to public safety that a Democratic state’s attorney, supposedly in sync with the extras-legals in John Mitchell’s Justice Department, conducted a raid for the express purpose of ridding the world of Hampton. Which succeeded with his cops training machine guns on Hampton’s apartment door.

The outlaw cops then went looking for Rush, broke into his apartment but he wasn’t there. They finally got Rush on a charge of illegal possession of firearms including machine guns and he served six months in prison. When he came out, he decided he would live longer by going into politics than running guns and preaching violence. Which he did and was elected alderman. Then he challenged an old time docile machine congressman Charlie Hayes who was in serious arrears with floating checks in the House disbursement office, and won.

In Congress Rush has been unproductive and lackadaisical. He ran a race for mayor against Richard M. Daley that went nowhere and sputtered like a wet fuse. It was understandable that Barack Obama saw himself as leader of a new black generation—but in Bobby Rush’s district? He came on my show and announced for Congress, talking first in declaratives and then in vague intellectual terms. The campaign began with Obama getting what he expected—loads of earned media.

But then something happened. Pledging to introduce the latest gun control bill, he turned up missing from the legislature for two full months of the Senate’s winter session! Speculation ran rife: did Bobby take care of him? What happened to Obama? The time for introduction of his liberal dream of a gun-control bill came and no Obama. When he finally turned up, sheepish, he said he took his family on a vacation to Hawaii and while there his daughter got sick and so, gosh darn it, he had to stay in sunny Hawaii until she got better.

But Bobby Rush knew better. He said that Obama, a Hawaiian by birth, yearned for the sun and wanted to miss Chicago’s brutal winter while the legislature was in session. That made sense to the voters. When Obama next appeared on my show, he didn’t do well. He started out with intellectual talk about this epiphany and that epiphany but that didn’t work. He switched gears and talked pork chop with short declaratives. That didn’t work. He came across as a luxury-loving who loved warmer climes. Bobby Rush, the old Black Panther, knocked him out of the box 61% to 30%.

Not many people, black or white, took Obama seriously for a long time after that. He was ambitious, still called me up to get on my show but he was only one of many who wanted to get ahead. A few years passed. Then Republican U. S. Senator Peter Fitzgerald quarreled with his party—House Speaker Dennis Hastert and the new state chairman Judy Baar Topinka. Abruptly, Fitzgerald decided he would never get reelected with all those strikes against him so he announced he wouldn’t run again. With Fitzgerald out, there was a great flurry of interest in the Democratic side. The odds makers saw Dan Hynes, a pro-abort Irish Catholic state comptroller and legatee of one of the hallowed old Democratic names, as in the lead. Then there was one Blair Hull, who sold his trading firm to Goldman-Sachs for $531 million, who vowed to spend as much as it took to get the nomination. There were a few others including a token Hispanic and, yes, Barack Obama. But the media knew him from the contest with Bobby Rush so nobody was excited.

As the race began, it appeared that Blair Hull would make good on his ability to buy everyone—a hallowed Illinois tradition. But then his wife went public, sought a divorce and charged he was “a violent man with an ungovernable temper” who gave her a few whacks. He said he gave her the few whacks to make her stop kicking him. Young Dan Hynes came across as magnetic as a lead nail. In the TV debates that left the tall, courtly, deferential-appearing Barack Obama. Everybody gave him a second look. The same with the editorial boards. He came off as a statesman. He charmed the country club Tribune by moderate sweet-talk; the more militant Sun-Times with modified anger and some declaratives. Everybody in the Democratic party and the liberal media suddenly wept for the old days of civil rights. The pork chop unromantic black contingent that votes strictly pigment were mustered by Senate President Emil Jones. Obama won the nomination.

On the Republican side, a minor sex scandal torpedoed a multi-millionaire leading candidate. He withdrew which left the GOP high and dry. The GOP, eying Obama, decided to pick a black for its candidate and imported none other than Alan Keyes from Maryland. They’re still trying to find the guy who came up with the idea of Keyes—and nobody will own up to it. Keyes, a Harvard Ph.D, was all that he has ever been—a stirring orator, a gifted rhetorician, a brilliant polemicist—but he was the world’s most erratic campaigner. Designed for big hall shouting orations rather than the cooler TV medium, he blew out the TV-radio fuses in other races for the Senate—in Maryland. He lost to Paul Sarbanes 62% to 38% and Barbara Mikulski 71% to 29%. In between times, he blasted Hillary Clinton as a carpetbagger for moving to New York to run for the Senate. Now he was moving to Illinois from Maryland overnight to set up residence and he tried mightily until the sweat rolled down his forehead to conjugate the distinction.

Moreover, he left his political prudence at home. Talking at a news conference about home safety, illustrated by a owner who defended his suburban house with a gun, he veered into the subject of Israel and said he espoused the same rights here as they had there—that everybody should own machine guns if they wanted to. Wheeling around in other conferences, he blasted Dick Cheney’s daughter as an immoral hedonist because she was a lesbian and then was insulted publicly by his own daughter who said she too is a lesbian. He swung wildly, attacking two key journalists who are, in fact, conservative and his supporters.

All the while, Democratic nominee Obama cruised in the stratosphere and was picked to deliver the keynote to the Democratic National Convention. Here Obama had to convince an audience he wasn’t just a recycled Jesse Jackson, Sr. who could project an image of revival from Galilee to Jubilee. He scored. It was a keynote that was notable for saying very little that was different. But suddenly as a huge chunk of America tuned in, it saw a tall, angular Sidney Poitier type with a soft, safe-sounding clichés that didn’t frighten anybody. He said things that were banal, starved for intellectual nutrition, but still rather uplifting. How about this quote? “My parents shared an improbable love and an abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation. They would give me an African name, Barack, or `blessed,’ believing in a tolerant America your name is no barrier to success.” Really stirs your blood, what? But he became a black that everybody wanted to see triumph.

Another: “The pundits like to slice and dice our country into red states and blue states. But I’ve got news for them. We worship an awesome God in the blue states and we don’t like federal agents poking around our libraries in the red states. We coach Little League in the blue states and have gay friends in the red states. They’re patriots who opposed the war in Iraq and patriots who supported it. We are one people, all pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes, all defending the United States of America.”

These are bland statements enough to cause a Rotary club to dose rather than a stirring Democratic keynote. But Democrats and most of America was thrilled and since that time believe they have detected a rare commodity: a black Democrat who doesn’t talk in heroic couplets.

Doris Day, the sweet freckled faced girl next door, really swore like a longshoreman. And she despised Que Sera Sera--but when she sang it her blue eyes became like saucers. To national audiences, Obama is as bland as warm milk and a butter cookie. But with new handlers, his inner voice is the seldom used declarative voice. Even with a slight voting record of only two years in office, he .is a stringent pro-abort, a soft-spoken but firmly declarative opponent of the federal marriage amendment. He voted against confirming John Roberts as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, against confirming Sam Alito as Justice. There is scarcely an issue before the Senate that he is not aligned with the liberals on. He voted against making the Bush tax cuts permanent, campaigned against making the death tax cuts permanent, has turned his campaign over to word-smiths like David Axelrod, his shrewd consultant and sidekick of Rep. Rahm Emanuel. Together they ghost-think his campaign while Obama goes in the stratosphere trying to blur boundaries. To the outside and to independents and even Republicans as well as to mushy liberal Time magazine, he is a blooming idealistic youth of sweet reason. Axelrod and Emanuel chortle and give themselves high-fives over that deception.

And when needed, the Axelrod-Emanuel team has him say the words that pay the liberal bills. Estate tax cuts were designed for “Paris Hilton.” On Iraq he sides with those advising withdrawal: in essence, there is nothing about Obama that isn’t Emanuel-Axelrod kosher, complete 100% social and economic liberalism, but it is wrapped in a beautiful package of pleasantness and minimum polarity. All the while, their Destiny’s Tot candidate is rolling in big dough with handsome sales for two books and rock star souvenirs not to mention that the University of Chicago hospitals have decided to promote his wife to a vice presidency and a $300,000 per annum salary for “community relations”—read: political influence with her pillow-mate.

Both Axelrod and Emanuel understand that the Senate is a terrible place from which to run for the presidency. John Kerry’s plight—where he voted for continuation of the war before he voted against it—which caused him to be laughed out of town does not just pertain to Kerry. The longer one is in the Senate, the more he can be pictured as a trimmer. For that reason, it was astute for a young John F. Kennedy, a backbencher in the Senate, to run for president before the natural contradictions of lengthy voting records caught up with him. Therefore, Barack Obama would be wise—from his standpoint, to run for president in 2008. The Democratic party is tiring of Hillary Clinton, has seen John Kerry who botched the 2004 election threaten to botch this one in 2006 with his ridiculous unintended slur to troops in Iraq.

That’s why with slender record and a vague mist of personality, managed all the while by hard lefties Axelrod and Emanuel, Barack Obama may well end up in 2008 with the nomination. They have to move quick. Already their creation has started to melt like a snow-cone in July and must be put in the deep freeze before he turns to mush. Obama is the last politician who should be tainted with any semblance of an ethics violation: that’s why Harry Reid named him the point man for the Democrats on ethics questions in the Senate. But as it must to all frail political humans, Barack Obama has good contacts and likes to use them. The Chicago “Tribune” reported not long ago that Obama has been a longtime friend of Tony Rezko the indicted fund-raiser for Rod Blagojevich. So good a friend that Obama bought a mansion in the Kenwood area of Chicago for $300,000 less than the asking price. On the same day, Rezko’s wife bought the adjoining lot, shelling out the full $625,000 asking price. The question is whether Rezko’s wife subsidized Obama’s purchase of the mansion and also paid for an abutting private preserve that adds to the estate’s aura. Prepped by Axelrod and Emanuel, Obama became the misty-eyed visionary once again, blaming himself and saying he could kick himself for this dumb idea. Dumb, huh?

The once-again return to the Doris Day demeanor can work for the long-run. But the so-called innocent association of Destiny’s Tot with a notorious fixer is starting to cause some people to understand the real Barack Obama. Like Doris Day he is no wide-eyed innocent either in business terms or in political ideology. In ideology he is a hard neo-Fabian socialist with a romantic demeanor who can turn wistful and dream for reconciliation with the world. He wants to buy the world a Coke and have us pay for it. But let Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton issue the thunderous threats. That’s not Obama’s thing. He looks like an earnest young man, speaking from the heart. But I’ve known him just about the whole distance. He’s deceptive like Doris Day. All that’s missing is for him to croon “Que sera, sera!” whatever will be, will be. And watch the guilt-ridden white liberals stand up and applaud.

-

But it’ll take more than just the usual Emanuel-Axelrod spin to cause the Tony Rezko deal to die. The issue will not be determinative in `08 but will be there. But by all means let him run and get the fever out of our blood so a better man can win after Obama’s naivete is discovered.

Friday, November 3, 2006

Flashback: The 1964 Convention and the Birth of the Modern.

ChicagoTribune
[More reminiscences from fifty years in politics for my kids and grandchildren].

The Cow Palace in San Francisco produced a flawed Republican candidate for president but also the birth pangs that delivered a modern era GOP which sought no to be a pale imitation of the Democrats. In 1936, Alf Landon, billed as the “Kansas Coolidge,” was nothing of the sort but a liberal who conceded much intellectual ground; followed by a former Democrat, Wendell Willkie, who sailed under false pretenses and intended to become a full-blown progressive-populist; then Thomas E. Dewey twice. A measure of Goldwater’s inattention to philosophy beyond the bumper-sticker sort came in the early `60s when Brent Bozell wrote the first draft of what would become Goldwater’s signature opus: “The Conscience of a Conservative.” Bozell went to Goldwater, handed him the manuscript and asked when he should come back to get the amendments and revisions. No, said Goldwater, sit down and stay right there for a minute. He spun the manuscript through with his thumb, looked at the chapter headings, browsed through some for a few minutes and then handed the document back. It’s fine, he said. Bozell was bowled over. He didn’t know whether to cheer—that he had a book that passed muster that quickly—or cry that the long hours of constructive thought that went into it passed unnoticed. But he kept that lesson in his heart.

Goldwater’s stance was far different than that of Ronald Reagan who was paid little attention to detail—but Reagan’s inattention was to the levers and push-buttons of governance. He was powerfully interested in philosophy and indeed his radio talks, which he wrote personally, reflected an abiding firmness of primary belief. The next writer who approached Goldwater with substance was Karl Hess, a former anarchist turned conservative libertarian. Listening carefully to William Baroody, Dennison Kitchel and Ed McCabe, he produced the main draft of the acceptance speech. Goldwater did pay more attention to the speech than the book since he would be required to deliver it. Baroody, Kitchel, McCabe and Hess wanted to produce something far different than the usual acceptance where the victor brings to himself the dissidents and pledges they are all one team on the road to victory. The important thing was not to keep the old party that served well with Eisenhower but could not perform with others—but to form an entirely new party…composed of the dissident South, angry ex-Democrats, those urban dwellers torn up by civil rights riots in the streets and entrepreneurs who value liberty above all other aspects: including order.

So Goldwater, fully cognizant of what he was doing, said: “Anyone who joins us in all sincerity we welcome. Those who do not care for our cause, we don’t expect to enter our ranks in any case.” That was a kind of impolitic exclusion, bad politically but necessary for movement-building.

Then the preamble: “And let our Republicanism, so focused and so dedicated, not be made fuzzy by unthinking and stupid labels.” I could have foregone that sentence which sounded cranky and odd. And finally, the summation which I personally thought was perfect…not exclusionary but brilliantly realistic…and about as capsulized as anything Reagan was to say later: a declaration of a conservative philosophy…a statement that has ever since been criticized by liberals but which nevertheless conveys the heart of robust conservative vision:

“Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice! And moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue.”

Standing on the convention floor looking up at this silver-haired, bronze lawmaker, trim and magnetic in a blue suit, I knew Brad Heffelfinger, a liberal, had been wrong in saying “oh well, let the conservatives have it for once; we’ll be back in other years.” Not so. Conservatism was born that hour by this imperfect means and was so generated that a framework was struck for future victories—based on a realignment of the South…and not so much by anti-civil rights, either, but by a natural force: conservative animosity to federal government strong-arming.

Earlier Nelson Rockefeller, the architect of his own defeat—a man who very easily could have become the nominee had he been able to restrain his carnal, womanizing impulses that ultimately took his life which led him to believe as a Rockefeller he could do anything and everything and make people like it—faced the convention and was booed when he tried to link conservatives with Nazis.

“I can personally testify as to their existence,” he said pointing to his unhappy California campaign. “And so can countless others who have also experienced anonymous midnight and early morning telephone calls, unsigned threatening letters, smear and hate literature, strong-arm and goon tactics, bomb threats and bombings and infiltration and take-over of established political organizations by Communist and Nazi methods.” The apocalyptic portrait he drew was fantastically overdone and the crowd roared its denunciation of him. “There are some of you who don’t want to hear this, ladies and gentlemen,” he shouted, “but it’s the truth.”

Not remotely. Earlier, too, Dwight Eisenhower, at 74 once perceived as a liberal Republican but now becoming more conservative as he aged—particularly with respect to violence and civil rights demonstrations in the streets that turned destructive, wrote a paragraph into a talk that was supposed to be conciliatory but linked him thenceforward with the conservatives. “Let us particularly scorn the divisive efforts of those outside our family, including sensation-seeking columnists and commentators, because, my friends, I can assure you that these are people who couldn’t care less about the good of our party!” He added a second hand-written sentence: “Let us not be guilty of maudlin sympathy for the criminal who, roaming the streets with switchblade knife and illegal firearms seeking a helpless prey, suddenly becomes upon apprehension a poor, underprivileged person who counts upon the compassion of our society and the laxness or weakness of too many courts to forgive his offense.”

I was sitting in the Minneapolis “Tribune” press box as he said it. There were muffled slurs about Eisenhower from the “objective” reporters there but the Cow Palace crowd went nuts. As I looked across the arena, I saw the beginnings of a spontaneous demonstration and in the middle of it a handsome, grey-haired man, dressed very much like a banker, waving the Illinois standard. Obviously I was interested in what my birth-state and the state to which I was to return was doing. I shielded my eyes and tried to see if Bob Stuart was in the crowd but could not see him. I was particularly fascinated with the trim banker with a mustache tinged with grey, wondering who he could be and speculating that possibly in the future I would be dealing with him.

Just at that minute, a reporter friend of mine from the Minneapolis “Tribune” yelled: “hey! Look at that! See that guy waving the Illinois standard? There he goes, taking the standard and—see him?—he’s leading the demonstration for Illinois. You know who he is?” I said no.

“That’s—do you believe it?—that’s the political editor of the Chicago Tribune, George Tagge. Hey, Roeser, you’re going to be dealing with him when you go to the oats factory in your home town! He’s not only the Trib’s political writer he’s the Republican party’s best strategist. See—there he goes, jumping up and down! How’s that for objective journalism, Roeser? Wouldn’t you like to see us do that for good old Barry?”

I said yes I would and gradually eased myself out of the press box, hurrying down to the convention floor. I had some delegates badges from Minnesota GOP delegates who were turned off at Goldwater and didn’t want to go to the convention. I got on the floor and muscled about a half mile through seas of people until I got to Illinois. The demonstration had subsided and the chairman was reading another introduction. I finally saw Bob Stuart and sat for a time with him. He was enjoying the convention but I sensed he was not a Goldwater backer—yet a loyal Republican. When we finished our brief conversation…agreeing as to when I’d start at Quaker and that I’d see him on my first day…I started looking for Tagge. He was sitting in a delegate’s seat with a small portable typewriter on his knee, writing facilely. The roar of the convention was deafening so I knelt down to shout in his ear:

Mr. Tagge, you don’t know me but I’m going to be working with Bob Stuart at Quaker Oats.

“Oh, I’ve heard of you, all right,” he shouted back. “You’re a Minnesota transplant liberal sumbitch—one of those who beat Barry at your state convention. I told Bob not to hire you but Lord Robert is close to Sir Charles and he doesn’t listen to me.”

That’s how Tagge spoke. Sir Charles was obviously Chuck Percy. Lord Robert was my boss-to-be.

“You’ll get to know `em,” he yelled as he continued to punch the keys of his typewriter. “They meet all the time at the Van Buren Street Y. You been to the Van Buren Street Y?”

I continued to kneel, trying to figure out what the Van Buren Street Y was. Then I understood.

You mean the Chicago Club!

“That’s right. You catch on fast.”

No, I’m a guy from the northwest side. I don’t have a membership there although I understand you do, Mr. Tagge. Congratulations. I guess that makes you a knight of the Roundtable with Lord Robert and Sir Charles…while I’m just a nobody who worked for that wild liberal Walter Judd.

“I love Walter Judd. Well, I’ll tell you what. If you let me alone now to write this damn thing I’ll take you there for lunch and indoctrinate you first before they can get a whack at you, how’s that?”

When that lunch happened, in my first week at Quaker, Tagge, his graying mustache bristling…looking for all the world like a prosperous banker…knowing what to order, being specific about how he wanted his fish prepared…nodding to patronizing CEOs who tried to catch his eye as we lunched, gave me a kind of first-hand look at the Republican party of Illinois.

“You’re familiar with the Bourbons—the family not the whiskey. Bourbon kings ruled France in the 16th century. They went on until the French Revolution. They tried to come back but never really did. There was a Bourbon family in Spain—they spelled it Borbon which continues in some minor matter to the present day. Anyhow—this party is dominated by variants of the Bourbons. Your boss is one: Bob Stuart; his father, Doug and his Uncle John. You know Bob; get to know Doug. I don’t think you’ll ever get to know Uncle John but he’s not reliable. Not reliable. Nosirrr.”

Why not?

“For Rockefeller. Thinks he’d be good for the cities. Told me so. I struck him off my list. I like Doug and have high hopes for Bob. You I don’t know but what the hell you’re not a Bourbon anyhow. Others are the McCormicks of International Harvester, a tie-in to my late lamented—and when I say lamented I mean I lament—Robert R. McCormick, the greatest editor and publisher of his time. You’ve got Bob Ingersoll of Borg-Warner, a Bourbon and let me catalog them all for you. Got a pen?”

Which he did.

“Now,” he said, “what I will tell you now is interesting. In the old days, the Bourbons met with my old boss Colonel McCormick and they ran this goddamn party, see? The Colonel was very kind to me and I was sort of a junior valet to them. But they did the figuring. General Wood of Sears. Nobody could stand Sewell Avery of Ward’s so he didn’t play. But gradually there has been started a movement…that’s what it is…of so-called public affairs people. Not lobbyists particularly although there’s some of that. They are for the most part talented guys, more than businessmen—but philosophically committed conservatives in business. The big major domo right now is Charlie Barr of Standard Oil who along with a good number of other public affairs men in other states organized and managed the Goldwater effort. You have some in your state—Minnesota: Bill McFadzean of Archer-Daniels-Midland, Bill Bennett of 3M. They’re up-and-at-`em now but they’re time will be short.”

Why?

“Because already they’re exceeding their mandate. Charlie Barr is starting to run afoul of John Swearingen, his CEO. Charlie isn’t even a v.p. but a director of civic affairs, reports to a v.p. John Swearingen doesn’t like to have his man running around this convention with more power than he has, see? Makes sense, doesn’t it?”

Yep.

“The same with McFadzean. Here’s Jonathan Daniels of ADM, the scion of the family, who graduated with Bill Scranton who challenged Goldwater and Scranton tells Daniels, `Hell, Jon, your own company is against me. This guy McFadzean is the go-to guy for Goldwater!’ So McFadzean’s days on this earth are limited. So I’m telling you, buddy boy, if you want to be around here long, don’t try to ace your boss out of prominence. He sees his destiny with Percy. So be it. You tie your destiny with Percy too out of loyalty. But keep your own counsel and let him—Bob—know what you feel. Honest and true. No running behind his back. On matters you feel you can give me, keep me informed…not on company matters but on what you hear if it’s okay with Bob…because I hope this lunch seals a deal so that we can visit fairly often off the record. And if I can help you get around, let me know. I think you’ll find my name is pretty good.”

Pretty good. Like golden. There’s only one other journalistic operative who works that way and she’s one of the most effective…if not the most effective…political writers I know: Lynn Sweet. Like Tagge she’s an activist, a strategist and a thoroughly savvy reporter who, as Tagge was, is in it for the zest as well as the story and to achieve victory for her side: liberal democracy just as his was conservative Republicanism. When I say this she thinks I’m zinging her but I’m not.

She’s the equivalent on the left that George Tagge was on the right. He worked with Paul Powell to get state aid for McCormick Place: I’m not sure she would do something like that—but she could! The point is: the myth of objectivity in this business is a joke—not observed by anyone important…just maintained as a fiction by the purists. The job is interpretative reporting which means shaded with erudite political opinion. That’s the way it is with “The New York Times” if you don’t mind a little treason mixed in. Also the “Sun-Times” if you don’t mind the soft porno look which belies the really good journalism by staff that doesn’t have columns. But not observed by today’s “Chicago Tribune” because…with the news goes left…the editorials now going left but ending up with “stay tuned,” it doesn’t know what it believes. It can’t hire a cartoonist because a cartoonist can’t shade or straddle. Jack Higgins of the “Sun-Times” is one of the best—but he could never work at the “Tribune” because they would vie and dance and parse about his drawings long after deadline passed. Let’s put it this way: the editorial board of the “Tribune” has just as much backbone and courage as the general consistory of bishops in the Catholic Church. Take that from one who goes to Mass every morning. Does that give you a glimpse?

George Tagge RIP: Born in 1907, a graduate of the City News Bureau system in 1929, he became political writer, then editor, retired in 1986 and died at age 92 which means that he saw the slow, agonizing unfolding of a once great newspaper to the one that today…with few exceptions…tries to please all sides, embraces political correctness…and stands for not one enduring thing.

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

JOIN TOM ROESER AND HIS GUESTS ONCE A WEEK IN AN EXCLUSIVE OFF-THE-RECORD SESSION EVERY THURSDAY THROUGHOUT THE FALL! $250 FOR THE ENTIRE COURSE--FROM SEPT. 7 TO DECEMBER 21 FROM 6 TO 8:30 P.M. FOR WHAT WILL BE THE MOST EXCITING COURSE IN ACADEMIA!

Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad_208725c

The Roosevelt University Seminar on Public Policy Featuring:

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: A Fair and Balanced Mid-East Solution.

Karl Rove: What I Really Know About Valerie Plame

Sen. Barack Obama: Dreams of My Kansas-Born Mother.

Judy Miller: What I Had to Do to Get the Inside Story on Bush.

John Kerry: Why I Voted for the War Before Voting Against It.

Tom Cruise: Why I Started Taking Anti-Depressants Again.

Benedict XVI: My Easy-Does-It Plan to Catholicize the World.

Gov. Rod Blagojevich: Why the Press Made My Baby Cry.

Tony Peraica: Vote for Me and Nobody Gets Hurt.

Mayor Richard M. Daley: What Do I Have to Do for This Media,

Take Down My Pants?

I am disappointed and stunned to find that there has not been a rush to sign up for this course…which if not changed will be cancelled. I don’t mean to be petty about it but all those who have asked me for favors for the past three decades can forget about me doing any favors for them in the future if they fail to sign up and allow this course to be cancelled. If you can’t attend take out a “scholarship” and give it to someone deserving. If you can’t think of any deserving person i.e. a student, I can think of many. Contact me. The course’s official name is

Special Topics: Current Political Trends.

Where: Roosevelt University

Room 430

430 South Michigan

Chicago

When: Thursday evenings from 6 to 8:30 p.m.

September 7 through December 21, 2006



Fee $250.



Register at https://ww4.roosevelt.edu/pos390

Your $250 credit card payment will be required at sign up time…or bring your check payable to “Roosevelt University” to the first class session. No college credit will be given nor will you receive a grade for your attendance if you audit this course. To formally enroll and receive credit for the course or to find out more about Roosevelt University offerings, visit the website at www.roosevelt.edu.

I would request all those who sign up to audit the course let me know as soon as possible at thomasfroeser@sbcglobal.net

Hoping you will not let me down, I remain—

Thomas F. Roeser

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

ONCE AGAIN—The Roeser Public Policy Course at Roosevelt!

main_fdr


The Public Policy course at Roosevelt University is open for students who want to audit the course. Earlier…due to an incompetent senior citizen…the on-line address was goofed up—so thousands of you complained that you couldn’t get through! This was not the fault of Roosevelt University but someone who shall be nameless. Once again the details of the course that has been a hit at Harvard, Princeton, Roosevelt (in the past), the Wharton School of Finance, the University of Illinois-Chicago et al. Register right now or all the seats will be gone.

Register on-line at https://www4.roosevelt.edu/pos390

Where: Roosevelt University

Room 430

430 South Michigan Avenue

Chicago

When: Thursday evenings from 6 – 8:30 p.m.

September 7 through December 14, 2006

Fee: $250.

Space is limited to the first 16 individuals who sign up through this form. Your $250 credit card payment will be required at time of sign-up or bring your check payable to “Roosevelt University” to the first class session. Refunds will only be given if requested by September 9th by calling Roosevelt University’s Student Accounts Office at (312) 341-3571. Please note: no college credit will be given nor will you receive a grade for your attendance. To formally enroll and receive credit for this course or to find out more about Roosevelt University offerings, please visit our website at www.roosevelt.edu.

Thursday, August 17, 2006

JOIN TOM ROESER’S ROOSEVELT U PRACTICAL POLITICS EVENING CLASS THIS FALL!

fdr
Roosevelt University invites you to participate in my course “Special Topics: Current Political Trends.” This special and unique offering allows you to attend class sessions at a greatly reduced fee on a non-credit basis.

It’s the same class I taught as a John F. Kennedy Fellow at Harvard, a Woodrow Wilson International Fellow, Princeton, N. J. as well as at the Wharton School of Finance and other universities…and it’s coming to Chicago’s Roosevelt University each Thursday night from September 7 through December 21, 2006. It features guest appearances by elected politicians, media people, lobbyists, staffers, business types and grassroots movement leaders on an off-the-record basis who are grilled unmercifully by him and class members. Space is limited to the first 16 individuals who sign up through this form. Read the pertinent information below.

Register on-line at https://www4/roosevelt.edu/pos390

Where:
Roosevelt University
Room 430
430 S. Michigan Avenue
Chicago


When:
Thursday evenings from 6 – 8:30 p.m.
September 7 through December 21, 2006


Fee:
$250


Space is limited to the first 16 individuals who sign up through this form. Your $250 credit card payment will be required at time of sign up or bring your check payable to “Roosevelt University” to the first class session. Refunds will only be given if requested by September 9th by calling Roosevelt University’s Student Accounts Office at 312-341-3571. Please note: no college credit will be given nor will you receive a grade for your attendance. To formally enroll and receive credit for this course or to find out more about Roosevelt University offerings, please visit our website at www.roosevelt.edu

After you register on line using the designation above, check in with me at thomasfroeser@sbcglobal.net so I can keep track of who’s signed up. And keep on watching this website for latest information.

Tuesday, August 1, 2006

Personal Asides: Neil Steinberg, Still a Liberal and Forever a Liberal, Has a Great Column Nevertheless…Mel Gibson’s Shocking Words Betrays More Than Alcoholism

gibson
Steinberg.

As one of the best writers at the Sun-Times but one who wastes his talents often on trivia, Neil Steinberg occasionally hits it right on the button, while continuing to be fearful that he will be mistaken as a…gasp…conservative which is a no-no in Chicago’s Democratic newspaper of record. He is not a conservative, he is still pro-choice, he is still anti-Bush and shouldn’t worry about losing his alleged appeal to the Near North kids to whom the marketing department insists he focuses his column. But he just couldn’t contain himself yesterday and wrote from the heart against the latest phony, rascal and demagogic rogue to invade Democratic politics…Reverend, Senator James Meeks.

Meeks, while making a very good living as a stentorian yelling pastor for a congregation that evidently is very hard of hearing, while also making a state Senator’s salary and salving his insufferable ego by holding himself up as the archangel of the poor, is blaming everyone for African American kids not reading except the people who should get the blame—their parents (or, in most cases, their mothers who are overworked and try to raise their kids alone without the kids’ sperm donors). ”Just what the black community needs,” wrote Steinberg. “”Another demagogue to bang the gong of grievance and tell his audience that all of their problems are some powerful white guy’s fault. Education is one social issue where each individual can make a huge impact. Good parents know that.”

Yes, we conservatives aren’t welcoming Steinberg as a fresh recruit. We know he’s a liberal but just thank him for his common sense.

Gibson.

While he apologized for letting loose with atrocious anti-Semitism, Mel Gibson has more to worry about than angry Jews who, like Abraham Foxman, try to discredit his great “The Passion of the Christ” by saying that it is now clear the film is a hate document because of Gibson’s tirade. Nothing of the sort. But several things should worry Gibson more than his hideous embarrassment. First, the pent up fury that was unleashed by the bottle is more than the ravings of a drunk: they are the ravings of a near-madman. The Jews are responsible for all the world’s wars? Second, being out of his house careening his car in Malibu at 90 mph shows that his family life is in tatters. Third, after he finishes his rehab, he’d better subject himself to deep spiritual therapy. Getting drunk frequently is the symbol of alcoholism. Shouting wildly is another. But spewing this irrational, hateful nonsense shows that there is something more at work here than alcoholism. And he’d better figure out what it is. Better still, he ought to get on his knees and confess whatever it is that’s eating him…for that cancer is what’s doing him in. And while he’s at it he should look into marriage counseling, too. Nobody who behaves like that has a good marriage. If he can’t control this, he’s going to end up on a slab in the morgue.

Flashback: Humphrey Tosses a Reverse-English Slider in Mid-Winter Special Election

[More memories of almost fifty years ago in Minnesota politics].

While down in the dumps after the disastrous and expensive television show which, we feared, could well have sealed Quie’s doom, I received a phone call from my patron. I almost feared to take it. On the other hand, she couldn’t have seen our abortive telecast in exurban Wayzata so I grabbed the receiver and said, “hello?”

“Good news!” said Mrs. Elizabeth Heffelfinger. “I knew you would spell the difference when you went down there!”

How cruel can you be? I thought. But she burbled on.

“I’ve had an inside look at the Minnesota poll which will be published in the [Minneapolis] Tribune Sunday!” She had a close relationship with John Cowles, Sr., the publisher. “It shows Quie ahead by ten points. That’s wonderful given no one really knew who he was when he started running. That’s really your doing, darling so I wanted to congratulate you for being a smart kid. Did you ever get a Minnesota drivers’ license?”

Yes, I said, but I can’t believe it. She read the numbers and the analysis. The writer said that the preponderance of Republican votes in the 1st was due to its Republican heritage dating back to when Augie first ran in the Depression. I still couldn’t believe it. He added that DFLer Gene Foley’s dependence on labor union support meant he had to take a heavy pro-union line which seemed to be anathema in the rural and small town 1st. No, it didn’t sound right to me. We had been getting reports that Foley’s meetings—especially the ones where Hubert Humphey and Gene McCarthy would introduce him—were outdrawing us.

“Well, are you saying you know better than the Minnesota Poll?” she said, miffed that I wasn’t exhilarated. I said no—but it’s hard to believe.

“And that’s not all,” she added. “I have the private poll here from General Mills, the NorthStar which was taken especially for Peavey and me. It has Quie ahead by twelve. Ten point in one, twelve in another. When is that special election—ten days from now?”

No. Closer than that. Next Tuesday.

“Grand. Peavey and I want to throw a celebration bash for the campaign. I understand Quie doesn’t drink. A shame. But we’re having some people over and you can tell them what went on. Let’s plan it on the next day—Wednesday.”

First, I said, there’s something scary to me about planning a victory party.

“Oh pooh. You’re an old fogy for somebody who’s only 29.”

Second, if Quie does win, the major credit should go to Ed Viehman his campaign manager.

“Double pooh. He’s an old guard reactionary. He was for Bob Taft for God’s sake.”

Brad, I’ve seen `em all and he’s a genius. Com’on. I can’t go without him being there.

“All right. Will he regale us with stories from the Birch society?”

Brad, he’s not like that. He’s the best thing this state has had—since, of course, you and Peavey.

“Hmm. I hear he really [double worded explective] the TV show.

No. It was an act of God. I’ll tell you about it when I see you.

***********

As soon as he heard, Viehman stormed into my office. Humphrey was holding a news conference at the Kahler hotel in a half-hour. Could I slip in? My days of slipping in news conferences were over since I was pretty well identified—but I’d go: they couldn’t very well kick me out. But I’d be the goat.

“No one fits the part better,” he said.

As he walked into the news conference, the junior Senator spotted me sitting in the back. He was uncharacteristically subdued. He began without the usual back-slapping of campaign aides.

We in the DFL have a policy of sharing not just good news but difficult news for us, he said somberly. The difficult news will cheer Mr. Roeser here, who is auditing us but we’ll share it anyhow. Our personal poll shows that the 1st district is still a horse-race but that we haven’t so far been able to close the gap that we would have liked to. We’re still seven points down. I’m distributing the poll now. I am told that other polls that have been taken report similar findings. But seven points is not insurmountable. I was ten points under Joe Ball when we went into Election Eve in 1948 and Harry Truman was so far down against Dewey that year that pollsters stopped taking them.

Let me say and Mr. Roeser better put this down in his notebook and get his track shoes on because we’re going to run his millionaire farmer candidate who inherited his spread out of this district with the facts that despite how well he has done with the Benson program, our neighbors have been suffering. And let me tell him along with all of you: this campaign to elect Gene Foley has just begun. I have never seen a better candidate and we will take the issue of slumping farm prices, an economy that rewards the haves and provides short-shrift for working men and their families…Now let me introduce the next Congressman from the 1st district, Gene Foley, who will outline a progressive program for small business…

I went back to Quie headquarters where Viehman was on the receiving end of phone calls cheering the good news that Humphrey released. He hung up, waved other calls to the campaign staff and said, “what do you think?”

I said Humphrey’s setting us up. It’s a standard DFL tactic. We’re not ahead and he’s hoping our volunteers will slow down or quit while his people, the labor union and Farmers Union people, will work even harder. It’s a setup. They did it in 1946 when they elected Fred Marshall over Harold Knutson who was chairman of Ways and Means. Humphrey who was state DFL chairman virtually tossed in the towel. It encouraged our people to relax. Marshall became national news for beating the highest ranking congressional Republican in the state. Same thing here I think. He’s trying to encourage Republicans to stay home by the fire in the coldest winter in years.

“I think so, too,” he said. “But why are the polls so bad for them?”

They’re not. The Trib poll is run by a DFLer who knows how to weight the numbers. NorthStar, although owned by General Mills, is run by a liberal Ph.D who worked in the Ag Department under Truman.”

That’s all I need to hear, he said. Call me a news conference. Which I did but it didn’t get Humphrey’s attention.

Early the next morning as the papers said Quie Leads Foley in House Race, Viehman held the news conference.

This race is not only close, said Viehman, contrary to what you heard from Hubert Humphrey Gene Foley is ahead. We can close the gap but only if our volunteers—and we have only volunteers while they have paid union and Farmers Union organizers—don’t listen to that siren call and syrupy blandishments from the junior Senator. Accordingly, I’m getting in my car as soon as we’re finished and am going to visit all fourteen counties in this district and am going to meet personally night and day with the campaign chairmen. Here is the schedule.

It showed that he would meet with Winona county at 8 p.m., Mower county at 10 p.m. and Winona county at midnight with the schedule beginning at 7 a.m. in Rice county, 8 a.m. in Goodhue, 10 a.m. in Olmsted. On and on. The press gasped. Lindroos the driver did, too until he was told he would have a sidekick driver to ride along and take over while Viehman dozed in the back seat. Moreover it started snowing again.

At 3:45 a.m. on election day, Viehman came into the office, kicking the snow off his boots and pulling off his commissar-style fur cap, waking me up and giving me marching orders for getting out the vote. I was to drop the press gig for that day and stay on the phone with county chairmen nagging them to get out the vote using every panicky word I could. All of us worked round the clock, taking brief naps in the office. I was to concentrate on the labor counties: Freeborn where Albert Lea was the county seat, Mower, with Austin the heart of the Hormel plant and Winona with two liberal Catholic colleges.

“Aw, gosh, Roeser,” said the chairman of Winona, an economics Ph.D at St. Mary’s, “Viehman was just here raising hell and the specter of everlasting socialism under Humphrey and Foley. Now you’re calling me every ten minutes. I tell you, we’re way ahead here.”

It was an election night counting the ballots—all paper and hand-marked, that lasted until 9:30 the next morning as all night the TV and radio exulted that the Democrats have unleashed a “last minute surge.” By 9:30 with the snow melting, the sun out, it was announced officially that Quie had won by 411 votes. The Dems trotted out their pet young lawyer, Fritz Mondale to urge a phony recount but there was no vote fraud in the pure 1st district. And the national reporters at the Kahler wrote that a once solid Republican district had just barely tipped Republican by the narrowest margin, repudiation indeed for Dwight Eisenhower. When they got around to it, they said that the district’s new Congressman, Albert H. Quie, was only elected by a hair due to hyper-energized volunteers who beat back paid organizers. We lost Mower by 20 votes, Freeborn by 200 but we were scheduled to lose them heavily. The economics professor chairman in Winona “Gosh, I don’t know where those Democrats came from. They just kept coming!” But we carried it narrowly. It seemed Irish Catholics liked the idea of Gene McCarthy and Gene Foley visiting them. Surprise.

While he didn’t negate the possibility of a recount winning for him, Gene Foley, a class guy, conceded anyhow, conditionally on the results of the recount: but that was gamesmanship. Quie, another class guy and I rode over to his election night headquarters to shake hands. We were greeted fairly well but ruefully. Gene McCarthy had vamoosed rather than face the music after an Irish Catholic Democrat lost—but Humphrey was there.

As Quie and Foley grinned and shook hands for the photos, I stood next to Humphrey and called him quite forgetfully by first name for the first time.

“You almost turned it around, Hubert with that reverse English,” I said.

“I don’t know what you mean.”

“Well it worked when you pulled it for Fred Marshall in the 6th.”

“Fred was always ahead.”

“Then why did you tell everybody Knutson was ahead?”

“I liked you better when you were at the St. Cloud Times.”

Later, when we parted he said, “See you in Washington.”

What do you mean?

“If Quie doesn’t take you with him he’s dumber than I think. Remember we have a re-match with Foley and Quie this coming November so enjoy working for a Congressman while you can..”

*************

“I see why you were pessimistic,” said Mrs. Heffelfinger on the phone. “But congratulations anyhow! We’re having the party Wednesday. Lots of people and you can bring your Mr.--.”

Viehman.

“Bring him along. I must admit from what I’ve been hearing Viehman and you saved the day with that last-minute drive-around.”

Viehman did.

“Oh stop. I only hope you’re not catching his conservative views.”

Me? Conservative?

I was exhilarated. We saved the 1st district and I wanted to resume my campaign to get Congressman Walter Judd to prepare to run against Humphrey in 1960 and to find a really good candidate to run for Governor that same year against Orville Freeman. At the party I drank a bit too much and trundled to bed in the coach house of the mansion.

Monday, July 31, 2006

Flashback: The Experiment with Live TV is a Disaster but I Couldn’t Stop My Hysterical Laughter Because the “Cerebral Palsy” Issue Arose

camera50s
[More remembrances from50 years past for my kids and grandchildren].

The plan was to air a 1958-style (black and white: color was still being worked on at RCA and in other labs) live TV (video tape not having been invented yet) interview with our Republican nominee for 1st district Congress, Al Quie, interviewed by his campaign manager (and former radio-TV celebrity) Ed Viehman. Accordingly the idea was for Quie, who had never been on live TV before, to rehearse with Viehman for five hours prior to our preempting the Huntley-Brinkley NBC News on Rochester’s KROC-TV. Quie reluctantly agreed but wanted to keep one campaign date in the morning, in the tiny town of Nerstrand, near his farm home, because the coffee had been planned by his minister’s wife. We said o.k. but he’d have to be back by noon. It seemed o.k. since Nerstrand was about only fifty miles away.

But the night before, an avalanche of snow started falling in accordance with Minnesota winters—and fell so heavily throughout the morning that I called Quie Rochester very early in the AM to tell him he’d better scrub the coffee and start heading our way for the rehearsal because the snow drifts were outracing the snowplows. Too late: I missed him: he had left super-early just to traverse the fifteen miles of so to Nerstrand. Viehman and I fretted in the studio throughout the morning, looking over the shoulders of the news tickers received by the scant news staff (many had not been able to show up for work) as the AP and the local Rochester weatherman announced that the snowfall was the heaviest in x-number years.

Then we got frantic when the news announced that the State Highway patrol wanted all non-essential traffic off the highways. The KROC weatherman said, “Tell you, boys. Quie can’t come. You’d better decide whether or not to cancel the show. I would, if I were you.” But the station manager told us, we paid for it and the show would (a) go on without Quie or (b) we’d get Huntley-Brinkley although we paid for the preemption, and to negate that we’d have to talk to their lawyer. The lawyer was unavailable, stuck in the snow in the middle of Rochester.

We panicked when the newsmen said at noon that a couple of Greyhound buses had run off the slippery roads but no one was seriously hurt. We tried to call Quie (that was long, long before cell phones). The minister’s wife said the coffee was held and that Quie and his driver Lindy Lindroos had begun the heroic, foolhardy fifty mile trip to Rochester against the protestations of the coffee crowd. As they started off from the house where the coffee was held, they waved goodbye and the crowd shouted “re-think it, Al! You can’t make it!”

The noontime TV news said that all traffic had mandatorily been halted in southern Minnesota. No word. Quie’s wife, at home at their farm, hadn’t seen or heard from him since early morning when he left with Lindroos, attired in arctic wear complete with hood, for the campaign meeting. She said she knew her man and that she was sure (a) he would try to make Rochester and (b) that he would make it. By 2 p.m. state highway helicopters were reported scanning the roads to rescue stranded drivers. We anxiously looked at the film to see he was one of them. No luck. By 3 p.m. Viehman was determined to report him missing to the State Highway Patrol but I desisted. Knowing Quie better than Viehman, I thought he’d make it—but too late for the telecast. By 4 p.m. we made a decision not to cancel the preemption although the station manager wanted us to and said he would promise to give us back our money: he said Rochester would be number one on Huntley-Brinkley and he sorely regretted giving us the preemption.

At 5 p.m. Viehman went into makeup himself, deciding to do what he was fully competent of doing: running the show himself which would have a mandatory audience throughout the snowbound 1st district. As a top performer (with a hidden, as yet un-confessed aspiration to run for office later) he was thrilled at the opportunity: not thrilled that Quie couldn’t be with him because his super-boss, mega-multimillionaire Dan Gainey was the type to hold his top sales employee responsible if Quie didn’t get elected, but thrilled that he, Viehman, would be able to make the case for Quie to the district with news of the telecast done heroically in a snowstorm communicated to the entire state. I personally thought Viehman alone on TV was a good idea: possibly better than with Quie. It was like having, putting it in reasonably modern terms, having Rush Limbaugh sell your candidate’s wares without the candidate: certainly the second-best option to the candidate…but considering the candidate had never been on TV before and by now had no chance to rehearse on a teleprompter, definitely the best option.

Viehman was seated at the desk on a lighted stage minutes before the countdown reading the script to himself, inwardly exultant that he would have the half-hour to himself, professionally making all the mental notes how to adapt the teleprompter script done in Q and A fashion to his own patter, honed after twenty years of radio and TV. The television studio crew, thrilled to see a real professional at work, snapped to, straining to see how he would take the script written for two and improvise. The regular announcers watched him and worked with him at the editing in order to get tips. It was to be the stunning Ed Viehman show, live and brilliantly orchestrated by Minnesota’s best announcer and showman. But alas. Reputations were shattered that night.

One and one half minutes before airtime, the studio rear door opened emitting a blast of snow so strong that two men raced over to force the door closed—but not before two tottering abominable snowmen stumbled in, ice and slush from head to toe. We literally couldn’t identify them at first. Initially, I thought the storm had blown open the door and the two mounds of snow that tumbled in had piled up next to the door. No, as it quickly developed as the studio janitors with brooms beat the snow away, the two mounds were Quie and Lindroos.

Both men slowly appeared to be recognizable as thick sheets of ice were pulled from their noses and mouths. They looked like Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd as pictured in our high school geography books after he waved stiffly to a camera having reached the South Pole. Their car had twice run off the road and both men like Hercules rocked it to and fro to push it back to the highway. Viehman, all set to go on, groaned. Quie was clearly becoming recognizable as studio men unwrapped unwrapped him as one would pull off the layers from a frozen-stiff onion…while Lindroos stumbled into an anteroom where the station manager found him some whiskey. He wasn’t as strong as Quie who, it seemed, with help from passing farmers twice pulled the car back on the highway. Lindroos hobbled to a couch in the rear of the studio and immediately fell asleep.

Removed of his overcoat, Quie, crimson-faced, blowing on his clenched fists to unlimber his fingers from stiffness, bounded, all six feet two of him with melting ice running down his face from his frozen crew-cut, to the table across from Viehman as the floor manager intoned, “We going live, gentlemen. Five-four-three-two…” For once in his professional life, Viehman was petrified since he was on a TV set with a wild, un-caged animal who had not the faintest understanding of the script and had utterly no stage presence or experience in improvisation. Viehman grinned in bogus joviality, signaled Quie to look at the teleprompter, told him to wait for the studio announcement, then watch the teleprompter which would move upward like a piano roller. Both waited.

The booth announcer said, “The regular program, Huntley-Brinkley and the NBC News has been preempted by the Quie for Congress Committee. Here is the Quie for Congress Campaign Chairman, Ed Viehman!” Then the floor director threw the signal that they were on live.

Before Viehman could begin, Quie, having been blinded by the snow glare all day was looking at the rising piano-roll-like script in huge letters for the very first time with narrowed, uncomprehending eyes shouted “Good evening!” in a voice that had been attuned to shouting to helpers over the storm. The sound man sprang up holding his ears as the booming voice exploded in his earphones. “Tonight…” Quie said, his head jerking down to upward as he inexpertly read the rising words on the piano roll of the teleprompter, “tonight you are to meet Al Quie!” Realizing he had just read Viehman’s introductory line, sank in his chair, momentarily defeated.

“Yes,” said Viehman recovering smoothly but interiorly ready to kill our candidate. “Tonight we are to meet you, Al Quie the Republican nominee for Congress in the 1st district” and he rolled on dispassionately while Quie’s eyes were rooted to the rising piano roll, moving his lips silently as he silently read to himself Viehman’s lines. So there were two talking heads, one actually pronouncing the words and the other moving his lips silently in perfect time, jerking his head from down to up as he read, in order to catch the words quickly as they rose on the piano roller of the telepromper, occasionally wiping his nose which had started to run in sudden reaction to the warmth after having endured hours of cold, squinting at the teleprompter as his head jerked up and down spasmodically. Viehman initially hadn’t noticed the compulsive head-jerking, but quickly did. Watching it, I thought it could be an ideal screen-test for an uproarious comedy on how a television show could be destroyed…ideal for Abbott and Costello who were then thriving.

“Tell you what…” Viehman said, poking Quie whose eyes were mesmerized by the piano-roller script, “let’s just talk, okay, Al?” and with the other hand tried to signal the teleprompter operator to cease—but the operator didn’t understand and kept the piano roll moving upward. The action mesmerized Quie, still reading to himself and not evidently hearing Viehman.

By this time they were taking me out in the rear of the studio as I was collapsing with mixed hysterics and near-sobs. Then Viehman almost grabbed his chin, turning Quie’s face to his and roared:

“OKAY, AL! WHY DON’T YOU JUST LOOK OVER HERE AND I’LL ASK THE QUESTIONS THAT ALL THE 1ST DISTRICT WANTS TO KNOW!”

At the end of the telecast, the crew didn’t know what to do so it watched in a silent stupor. Viehman’s reputation as the best, most unruffled, announcer in Twin Cities history evaporated among the crew which shuffled embarrassedly away. There had never, ever been a television show like it—in Rochester or anywhere else since the medium had been invented. After it concluded, Viehman and Quie went into a private conference. As they conferred, the phone calls started coming in. One old lady said, “What is wrong with that young man who is running for Congress? Has he had a stroke?” After answering a few, I decided to go back to the hotel and caught a ride with a snow-plow operator in the cab of his heavy machine as he shoved the mounds of snow aside.

“So how did the Quie show go?” the driver shouted over the noise. “Sorry I couldn’t watch it!”

That’s okay, I said, thinking of the reaction of the national press, holed in at the Kahler which was watching the show since there was nothing else to do. I prayed they wouldn’t be in the bar. And they weren’t.

It turned out the bar was all but empty, the media having gathered for sandwiches, drinks and TV viewing in a hotel suite courtesy of the Rochester Post-Bulletin. A few salesmen were in the bar and also, sitting alone, Congressman Eugene McCarthy, dark-haired, age 42, who was nursing a nightcap after addressing a Foley rally at the hotel. I joined him and became wary because his greeting to me was so effusive.

“I think,” he said to the bartender in a voice distinct enough for me and others to overhear, “the Republicans ought to be saluted for running a victim of cerebral palsy for Congress at this serious time in our nation’s history and for having the originality of putting him on live television, don’t you?”

The bartender, very impressed to be asked a question by a member of Congress agreed but was startled. His eyes widened. “Huh? Cerebral palsy? Quie? I didn’t know that Quie had cerebral palsy!”

“The sight of Quie,” drolled McCarthy with the seriousness of a theologian, “his head jerking up and down”—and here he imitated it perfectly—“gave us a newfound admiration for the Republicans’ decision to nominate him despite this lamentable condition.”

“Gee,” said the bartender. “Cerebral palsy, huh?”

His eyes twinkling at me, the Congressman arose, paid for his drink and mine and prepared to leave saying, “I imagine you’ll want to be alone anyhow.” After I straightened out the bartender that this was McCarthy’s weird brand of humor, I wasn’t alone very long. Viehman came in, ordered more, much more for us, and we sat together. When the bartender came back with our fresh drinks, he said, now excited to be serving ex-radio star Ed Viehman: “So Quie doesn’t have cerebral palsy?” Viehman eyed him with hostility. I collapsed in hysterics one more time. Viehman quickly pieced the scenario together, having just seen McCarthy exit, figuring that calumny was McCarthy’s.

“We just did a screen test to give him a part in a new film that’s coming out—a sequel--called `Around the Block in 80 Days with the Cerebral Palsy Marching Band.” “Around the World in 80 Days” had been an award winner in 1956.

The bartender frowned and said, “You know, I don’t understand anything you guys have been saying tonight. McCarthy comes in here, has a drink and tells me Quie has cerebral palsy. One of you said it’s not true and when the next guy comes in says Quie’s done a promo for a new movie. I figure all of you have been pulling my leg. Anyhow, it doesn’t matter to me `cause I’m voting for Foley. With that said, gentlemen, the house is now buying until we close at 1 a.m.”

As we drank, I speculated that possibly very few watched the show what with the need to shovel their walks and all. Viehman would not be assuaged. “My boss, Dan Gainey watched,” he said mournfully. “I told him to.” He was thinking about the industrialist’s irascible temper which made for a long, long evening.

And the election would be held in just 10 days.

Sunday, July 30, 2006

Flashback: Campaign Manager Viehman Picks Up Faltering Quie Campaign… National Media Focus on 1st District…DFLers Humphrey, McCarthy, Freeman, Rolvaag, Eugenie Anderson Go Town to Town

[More reminiscences from 50 years in politics for my kids and grandchildren]

As previously cited, with Ezra Taft Benson, the agriculture secretary, having cut dairy price props to the bone the preceding Christmas Eve spurring a national farm outcry, the mid-winter special election in Minnesota’s highly dairy 1st district continued to win top honors in 1958 as the test market of farm and small town sentiment for the November congressional and the 1960 presidential election. People in Rochester, the biggest town in the district, turned blasé as they bumped into David Brinkley (of NBC’s Huntley-Brinkley), Dave Broder, Nancy Dickerson (the only female political TV reporter), Teddy White (doing a warm-up for his “Making of the President: 1960”) as well as Harry Reasoner (then a Minneapolis local TV reporter), Bill Lawrence (ABC-TV) and Sander Vanoecur of CBS. All camped at the Kahler hotel along with our Quie campaign staff (me, Lindy Lindroos, Herb Johnson, the GOP’s state executive director). The new Quie campaign manager, former radio celebrity Ed Viehman, stayed at home in nearby Owatonna, driving in as a commuter each morning.

I was 28 and the only bachelor, Lindroos 26 with Johnson the old man among us, 54. Viehman, at 36, was a dark-haired, gregarious, occasionally bombastic and outrageous, occasionally breaking out in song in his campaign office, puffing a cigar and acting, well, there’s only one person who resembles him, something I’ve thought of many times: Rush Limbaugh. (An aside: To the uninitiated, Rush Limbaugh is a tough act to take on the radio if you don’t know that his supposed self-praise and extravagant claims for his own sagacity is a deliberate put-on. Rush will say he possesses “talent on loan from God,” that he is “having more fun than a man should be allowed to have” as a fast-talking conservative prognosticator, declaring that every word that emits from his silver-tongued mouth is the truth and that there is not a duplicitous bone “in any inch of my glorious, naked body.”

( Continued aside: To someone of moderate political inclination, the Limbaugh put-on is a definite put-off unless you have listened long enough to realize it is unashamedly invented. Don’t get me wrong: assuredly Limbaugh is an egotist but not in the way he fulminates outwardly which he milks for laughs. Yet he has a right to some egotism. For most conservatives he is a morning and early afternoon booster shot of energy after a séance with mainline media that continually predicts conservative disaster which has made him a mega-multimillionaire with a net worth conservatively—very conservatively—estimated at $250 million. Two years ago I met him for the first time when I with all other WLS talk show hosts were on stage at the Chicago theatre. I had told myself: perhaps you’re wrong and in person he doesn’t resemble Ed Viehman. But backstage as he clapped our backs and revved us up for the performance he was—irony aside—a dead-ringer in actions and mannerisms of Viehman, a man who today would be 84 and easily could have been father to Limbaugh.

(Further aside: The other day Howard Fineman, regarded as an astute analyst for Newsweek in the space of one interview with Chris Matthews, Tip O’Neill’s ex-publicist who is on MNBC, declared that Bush’s memory will be linked forever with defeat in Iraq, mistakes in Afghanistan, callousness to human need on stem cell, wastrel budgeting, an economy whose boom is not from his doing plus. Yes plus: Bush’s own body movements betray a man haunted by his own failures. Fineman said everything was going wrong except Laura Bush hadn’t skipped out to a motel with Karl Rove…and he was just about getting down to that when I turned him off. Limbaugh parodied him the next day in a remarkable satire that made me laugh so hard I almost drove off the road.

(Almost concluded aside: Limbaugh is the great antidote to the deep-barreled media voices of doom, the antithesis for, and indispensable to, those who can likely be caught up into a wave of defeatism by what he has termed the “drive-by media”—media which, like drive-by shootings on Chicago’s South and West Sides, spray a hail of bullets, demolishing all hope and then flee. In the 1950s with no recourse to the Big Three , NBC, CBS, ABC, their pessimism threatened to dishearten even a warrior like me. The nearest person I have ever heard and the heartiest, best-schooled, smartest, best-researched man—indeed one who could have easily have been the major national predecessor to Limbaugh —was ex-radio star Viehman--may he live forever in the eternity he so passionately believed in.

(Concluded aside: Why did he quit radio? Because in that era of before the FCC repealed `equal time’ there was no opportunity for a program to air opinions, hence no talk shows and no opportunities for any. The only alternative for an activist was to run for office. And I think it’s clear that Ed left radio for southern Minnesota and a lucrative job in order to position himself to run for the U. S. Senate—a dream that, because of his tragic death, could not come true. Had he lived, as a vibrant campaigner, phrase-maker and fellow Catholic to Gene McCarthy, he would certainly have been nominated as challenger to the somber, introspective McCarthy in 1964 when Viehman would have been only 41. But, then again, that being the Goldwater year, McCarthy would probably have defeated him; but as with the tradition of so many, Bill Proxmire and others, Ed could well have made a second run for public office and won.)

*************

Those were the days when private public opinion polls were very few. We relied on the liberal Minneapolis Tribune’s which came out only twice during the campaign and on one produced by NorthStar polling, a covert polling adjunct of General Mills and 3M. NorthStar showed that while 1st district Minnesotans were learning how to pronounce the name Quie (“kwee,” as in “It’s kwee for Me: a Family Farmer”) relatively few had any sense of who he was, just a state senator from Rice county. Accordingly, Viehman rolled the dice and did what it those halcyon days a campaign could do: he preempted the top-rated Huntley-Brinkley NBC News Tonight show on KROC-TV Rochester, which beamed to the whole district and decided to supplant it with one-half hour of personal interview between Quie and a well-informed reporter. In those early days of television, Quie had never been on live TV for any sustained period so he needed a well-informed reporter. The well-informed reporter would be, you guessed it, Viehman himself: a better choice that all agreed could not have been made.

But he and I had a terrible fight over the preemption. I thought it was a disastrous thing to preempt such a popular TV news show (in those days it was only one TV news show of three in the nation) for a political telecast. He told me (a) I knew nothing of communications and (b) basis my stupidity in questioning his judgment as the greatest state communicator in modern times, obviously I was a near-retardate who not only knew nothing but was incapable of learning anything. These gigantic exaggerations made him lovable but I still fought until the closing bell when I lost. And I would have lost the final strategic round as well had the show not proved to be such a disaster that we prayed no one had seen it. But that wasn’t Viehman’s fault but due to an Act of God.

When the newspapers carried the news that “Huntley-Brinkley” would be preempted by the Quie committee, there was an immediate outcry in the 1st but Viehman was prepared for this. He said the outcry was from the yokels and that the show would be so dynamic as to electrify the district’s majority Republican base. I was dubious but was told to shut up and write the Q and A script for the show which I did. I then had it put on a teleprompter, then an archaic instrument that ran the script in HUGE letters down a narrow column which made one no initiated with TV to bob his head to catch the letters as they were coming up to eye-level. Viehman privately ran through the script twice on the teleprompter, performing smoothly. Then he ordered that Quie cancel all his appearances earlier that day, come to the studio and as a novice, rehearse the script with him as the tutor over and over until it ran smoothly. I really agreed with the need to practice with Quie. (For those moderns who ask why we didn’t tape it the answer is simple: it was before the era of video tape; only dull, smudgy film. To make an impression, the show would have to be telecast live.)

But like all candidates, Quie hated to give up even one carefully scheduled series of coffees in the far reaches of the district. Thereupon he and I had a fight, where I, exasperated by having lost a fight to Viehman was now likely to lose another with the candidate who didn’t particularly care for the Huntley-Brinkley preemption either. I asked him: what in the world is the matter with your head—refusing to give up coffees of 30 or 40 people in Nerstrand, Minnesota and another 40 in Red Wing for a chance to address many thousands on live TV? He finally agreed, with one proviso. He would have to keep the coffee with a handful of people in Nerstrand, his all but actual home-town because his Lutheran minister’s wife was hosting it and he couldn’t bear to face her and ask for a cancellation. This is symptomatic of the first-time candidate, equating a tiny audience with a potentially huge one, a view which has killed many able men, some more able than Quie who was a very good candidate. Humphrey would have scrubbed a meeting with his own aged mother for a chance to get rested up for live TV.

Very reluctantly Viehman and I allowed him to do it: a mistake on both our parts. Nerstrand was about 50 miles away from Rochester and he could easily return in an hour. The coffee was mid-morning which meant that Quie could be in the studio at no later than Noon, grab a sandwich and put in five hours’ practice with Viehman and the teleprompter before the show would go on live at 6 p.m. Lindroos my fellow staffer would drive him so all he had to do was to relax on the way back and get in a mood to be good on live TV. But, I tell you, God intervened in an exasperating way.

Friday, July 28, 2006

Personal Asides: The Bells of St. John Cantius…The Wrecking of An Historic Chapel

dePaul


Cantius.

It is one thing to be the Democratic newspaper of record which the Sun-Times indubitably is…and to allow its version of the late George Tagge, Lynn Sweet, to do commentary that fits snugly with the Democratic party’s objectives (laudable)…but it is another to spur its food editor to write Hispanic-flavored politics and Op Eds, with the same predictably liberal bent. Nothing wrong and everything right for a paper that is uniformly interpretative of the news (as this Blog has repeated dozens of times) to pitch a unified view throughout. But the food editor? Does she know whereof she speaks? What qualifies one Sue Ontiveros to take positions on foreign policy and other things except, of course, on Hispanic matters? After all, she’s an Hispanic woman which means in the hyper-sensitive attention the paper gives special categories (minorities, gays, disabled, the chronically left-handed) grants her a special platform to expound on subjects different from describing how to prepare flank steak so that it is tender. Perhaps it’s because they aren’t paying her enough so she has to represent Hispanics on issues of moment in her off hours away from the stove. But now she has become an oracle on the need of tradition to accommodate gentrified neighborhoods.

Ms. Ontiveros does not write a column that costs much intellectual exertion. Her topic yesterday was the St. John Cantius bells and why they should be silenced at certain times to accommodate a changed neighborhood. It is plain that she is not a traditionalist nor one with a particular affinity for Old World tradition. After 108 years, a church that served principally Polish congregates rang its bells from 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. has been ordered to silence them at 9 p.m. to accommodate the upper classes which have condos in the now swiftly economically improving sector. These are people largely, it could be estimated, without either a feeling for church disturbing their sleep or an interest in tradition. Ms. Ontiveros agrees with them. But why is Ms. Ontiveros writing about this? Because those who are disturbed about religious significance penetrating their secular society are disturbed, certainly—thus it is just one more bleat in the uniform orchestration of liberaldom for which her newspaper is so passionately solicitous.

And the same orchestration of the deep-dyed blue newspaper may well have led to the selection of a letter on the same topic—denouncing the bells—from a powerful liberal resident of the neighborhood, one Jonathan Daniel Edelman, scion of the powerful Daniel Edelman who has been the towering figure of political influence in the Democratic party for many years. Reading Jonathan Daniel Edelman’s assault on the church makes clear that he is not only a non-parishioner (which we may have easily assumed anyhow) but that he resents any intrusion of more enduring values than are concerned with developers’ needs and allied commercial expansion. In his letter Edelman is vexed with the fight that the church put up against him and his lawyers who serve his will.

This Blog does not understand Ms. Ontiveros’ motivations other than the laudable one: she wants to keep her job with the Democratic newspaper. But Jonathan Daniel Edelman we can understand. He has a business interest that he may feel is jeopardized if residents are made uncomfortable and spurred to De Profundis by the ringing of the same bells that called immigrants to prayer of more transcendent issues than the making of money. In any event, the Sun-Times has weighed in on what it considers important—just as the slowly improving Tribune in taking Cantius’ side has done more eloquently than its tabloid competitor (to which the presidential-prompted beatification of Barack Obama represents its deepest view on spirituality).

Chapel.

This Blog has written somewhat disparagingly about the Vincentian Order of Catholic priests which has run DePaul University into the ground by sponsoring a minor in Queer Studies and shucking crucifixes from the schoolroom walls so that non-Christians will not be embarrassed by representations of the Christ a billion of the world’s population believes gave His life that redemption should come to all. If the Vincentians, who carry the imprimatur of St. Vincent DePaul don’t want to see people embarrassed by Christ’s sacrifice, that’s their call: just don’t continue mislabeling their near-brothel of dorm decadence and academic sacrilege America’s largest Catholic university. But now there is another nadir of bad taste scooped up from the muck of disrespect by the Order.

As architecture expert and key businessman John Powers, a friend of this Blog, points out that Barat College in Lake Forest, a marvelous old educational institution owned by DePaul didn’t evidently make the requisite profit for its cost accounting clerical leaders so it was sold to the highest bidder to a real estate developer. That Vincent DePaul, founder of the order that bears his name and the Sisters of Charity, established a society that renounced all materialistic gain and be entirely devoted to the poor, would be disgraced by the big businessmen and Democratic party Irish hacks who serve on the board which carries his name is evident.

Not content with failing to put Barat to good use, the Order is sidling up to the most crass evidences of the developer trade by trying to make a quick buck by bowing to the autocratic whim of the developer who has ordained that the ornate and beautiful Chapel of the Convent of the Sacred Heart which is part of Barat must go for him to satisfy the latest whim of his despicably bad taste. John Powers who published an outstanding book showing beautiful churches asks: “Is simony a good enough reason to destroy the sacred architecture?”

A meeting of the Lake Forest city council two days ago was inconclusive but evidently holds out some hope. John has promised to send this Blog photos of the church which we will be happy to post. Godspeed, John and to the Vincentians who has forgotten their mission here and elsewhere: Good God, gentlemen: have you no soul whatsoever?”

Thursday, July 27, 2006

Personal Asides: The Penalty Against Big Box…The Publisher’s Wife…Marin’s Nonsensical Support of the Artificial Minimum Wage…The Answer to the Trivia Question which Nobody Got.

hunter-2
Mayor New York Jimmy Walker 1927


The Penalty.

The higher minimum wage levied as a punishment to Wal-Mart and other big stores can only be seen as an unconscionably reactionary act…one which had the support of the penny-ante careerists in the City Council. Their eyes have a common optical property: they can see their own aggrandizement and have no interest whatever in the real poor who will be deprived—just their own fat wallets. For once this Blog feels sorry for Mayor Daley who knows the penalties that will be exacted on his city. Organized labor which has taken over political campaigns and funding has become the giant boss in the city and is running a machine that becomes the new 12-cylinder, air-cooled, four-wheel brake model. The two papers did all they could do but there is no stopping a special interest when it seizes power or weak-character councilmen who smell the meat a-cookin’.

Publisher’s Wife.

Jennifer Hunter who does a column under that name but who is the wife of the Sun-Times publisher John Cruikshank, talks a good game about being an ex-magazine editor but still gets her clout at the paper the old-fashioned way by being married to the boss. Anyhow, she wrote yesterday that she wonders how Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice can be a Republican when she is (a) smart, (b) a child of the South where blacks were discriminated against. That is only the latest vacuous contribution the ultra-feminist pro-abort has made to intellectual discussion. Rather than answer it, one has to examine the blatant arrogance of the column which says she cannot understand how somebody as smart as Rice is not just like Jennifer Hunter and a passionate Democrat. It ranks right up there with some other egregiously liberal but undocumented and prejudicial contributions to the newspaper her husband runs as the Democratic newspaper of record. Baldly it asks: what right has Rice not to agree with me? Blacks are supposed to be liberal and Democratic. How dare she be different from my preconception of African Americans!

Being so partisan a Democrat fits the wife of the publisher of the Sun-Times. And running a Democratic newspaper of record is o.k., in fact salutary to a newspaper that purports to be “objective” when it is not, ever so slyly as long as the news is thoroughly interpretative and the editorials, columns and Op Eds crisp and challenging. But commentaries like Hunter’s should contain a grain of rationality. Ignorant, a giveaway of mal-education, it ranks with the immortal statement made by New York state Democratic chairman Paul Fitzpatrick who said in 1950 that Dwight Eisenhower had to be a Democrat because “a man of his convictions cannot be a Republican.” We all know how that one came out. Eisenhower became one of the most effective Republican presidents of the 20th century. Rice is not going to run for president but she is a Republican, is the most stunning symbol of the new age of independence for African Americans where they are not chattel of a single party. She will be regarded as one of the more intelligent and dexterous secretaries of state in history. And she got there the old-fashioned way, through ambition and intellect, Ms. Hunter.

Marin.



This Blog sees less and less value in the kind of personal perpendicular pronoun “I-I-I” commentary that Carol Marin does in the Sun-Times. It believes it will shortly take the vow of not commenting about her as she comes from the intellectual level where there is no analysis served up but conformity to liberal ideology is the highest of goods. What she has to say is simply what any slightly trained pro-Marxist circa 1917 would bleat so it is entirely without merit. Let this Blog make a vow not to mention her or her wafer-thin columns again. If it violates that trust, you are empowered to write and hurl down the imprecations of Zeus.

Trivia Answer.

Everybody tried real hard, particularly Frank Nofsinger out there in Connecticut. And he came pretty close: Al Smith or Fiorello LaGuardia. Very close, Frank—but not quite. The answer is that the speaker at the ship christening was the former song-and-dance man turned New York Mayor, Jimmy Walker, the predecessor to LaGuardia…the man who popularized the song “Will You Love Me in December as You Do in May?” Not exactly a big number now, understand. Thanks for trying. I’ll serve up an easier one soon.